The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 416·119th Congress·Introduced Feb 5, 2025

Marsh-Billings-Rockefeller National Historical Park Establishment Act Amendments Act of 2025

IntroducedPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Welch, Peter [D-VT]
Committees
Energy and Natural Resources Committee (primary)
Last action
Feb 5, 2025

Bottom line

This bill expands a national historical park in Vermont to include a working farm, codifies its use for agriculture and conservation, and creates a new institute to foster national park stewardship practices.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Marsh-Billings-Rockefeller National Historical Park Establishment Act to expand the park's boundary in Vermont, specifically to include the King Farm. It updates the methods for land acquisition, allowing for donation, purchase, transfer, or exchange, and specifies that the King Farm can be used for agricultural, forestry, conservation, and educational purposes. Additionally, the bill establishes the National Park Service Stewardship Institute within the park to promote and advance stewardship practices.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that the bill enhances the conservation mission of the Marsh-Billings-Rockefeller National Historical Park by expanding its boundaries to include the historically significant King Farm. They contend that allowing agricultural and forestry uses on the acquired land preserves a vital aspect of Vermont's working landscape heritage and offers unique educational opportunities. Furthermore, establishing the National Park Service Stewardship Institute will elevate the park's role as a national leader in conservation and resource management, fostering innovation and knowledge sharing across the entire National Park Service.

Opponents contend

Specific organized opposition to this bill is not readily apparent, given its focus on park expansion and conservation from willing sellers. However, potential concerns could theoretically be raised regarding the long-term federal financial commitment for land acquisition, maintenance, and the operation of the new Stewardship Institute, or about the implications of federal ownership on local land use planning and tax revenues, though these are not explicitly articulated in the bill text or common discourse surrounding such measures.

The bill is concise and clearly written, making it very accessible for an informed reader to understand its provisions and implications within a short timeframe.

Section 2

Park Boundary Expansion and Map Update

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends the original Marsh-Billings-Rockefeller National Historical Park Establishment Act by striking the existing boundary description and inserting a new one. It specifies that the park's boundaries will be as depicted on a new map dated August 2023. Crucially, it explicitly includes the King Farm within the park's boundaries, designating it to be divided between the park's historic and protection zones as determined by the Secretary of the Interior.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupNational Park ServiceImpactExpanded management responsibilities over new land, requiring updated operational plans and resource allocation.MechanismStatutory amendment to park boundaries.ScaleDirect, localized expansion of federal land management.
GroupOwners of King FarmImpactTheir property is now within the designated park boundary, making it eligible for acquisition by the federal government.MechanismInclusion on official park boundary map.ScaleDirect, specific impact on a single property owner.
GroupPublic and Park VisitorsImpactPotential for increased access to new areas and expanded recreational or educational opportunities within the park.MechanismPhysical expansion of the national park.ScaleBroad, positive impact on park users.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this boundary expansion ensures the comprehensive preservation of historically significant lands and natural resources, particularly the King Farm, which contributes to the cultural and ecological integrity of the region. They contend it enhances the park's ability to tell a more complete story of conservation and land stewardship.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against park boundary adjustments that are locally supported and involve willing sellers, as is anticipated with this provision. Concerns, if any, would likely revolve around the administrative burden or cost implications rather than the expansion itself.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the desire for expanded conservation and historical preservation with the administrative complexities and potential costs associated with integrating new land into a national park system, including the need to update official maps and management plans.

Section 3

Land Acquisition Authority and King Farm Use

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends the existing land acquisition authority for the park, explicitly stating that the Secretary of the Interior may acquire land within the park boundary through donation, purchase from a willing seller (with donated or appropriated funds), transfer from a federal agency, or exchange. It specifically mandates that the acquisition of the King Farm must include rights of access to and from the park. Furthermore, it outlines the permitted uses for the acquired King Farm land, including agricultural and forestry purposes, conservation that preserves its historic character, and educational activities related to agriculture, forestry, and conservation.

Section 5 (new Section 6)

Establishment of the National Park Service Stewardship Institute

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section establishes the National Park Service Stewardship Institute at the Marsh-Billings-Rockefeller National Historical Park. It outlines three core purposes for the Institute: to highlight and encourage advanced stewardship practices through various programs (workshops, public programs); to create opportunities within the National Park Service for identifying and sharing innovation through research and dialogue; and to identify and exchange best practices, enhancing leadership, partnerships, and community engagement in conservation and resource stewardship. The Institute is to be managed as a program of the park.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this