The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 4180·119th Congress·Introduced Mar 24, 2026

Forest Resources Accountability Act

IntroducedPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Bennet, Michael F. [D-CO]
Committees
Energy and Natural Resources Committee (primary)
Last action
Mar 24, 2026

Bottom line

The bill aims to permanently block a controversial road project and acquire the private land it would serve in the White River National Forest, prioritizing wildlife conservation and existing forest management challenges over new development.

What it actually does

This bill prohibits the construction of a year-round road and utility corridor in a specific area of the White River National Forest in Colorado to protect critical winter wildlife habitat. It mandates that any access to private land inholdings within this area must be limited to existing, unpaved, seasonal routes under special use permits. Furthermore, it directs the Secretary of Agriculture to acquire the associated 680-acre Berlaimont Estates parcel from a willing seller, incorporating it into the National Forest for conservation purposes.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that the bill is essential for protecting vital winter wildlife habitat, aligning the Forest Service's limited resources with critical public needs such as wildfire reduction and trail maintenance, and preventing further strain on an understaffed agency by blocking new, potentially costly infrastructure. They emphasize the importance of preserving natural resources for future generations and focusing on science-backed stewardship.

Opponents contend

Opponents might contend that the bill infringes on private property rights by severely restricting access to the Berlaimont Estates parcel, potentially leading to a 'taking' if the land is not acquired at fair market value. They could also argue that it sets a precedent for federal intervention in local land use decisions and might hinder economic development or access for private landowners within national forests.

The bill is concise and straightforward, allowing for a quick and comprehensive understanding of its provisions.

Section 1

Short Title

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section formally names the Act the 'Forest Resources Accountability Act.' This is a standard legislative practice to provide a common, easily referenced name for the bill.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupGeneral publicImpactProvides a clear and concise name for the legislation.MechanismScale
GroupCongress and legislative staffImpactFacilitates easy reference and discussion of the bill.MechanismScale

Supporters argue

Proponents argue that a clear short title aids in public understanding and legislative discourse, making the bill more accessible and identifiable.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against this provision as it is a standard procedural element of legislation.

Tradeoffs

None.

Section 2

Congressional Findings on Forest Service Staffing and Priorities

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section outlines Congress's findings, noting a significant decrease in Forest Service staffing in 2025, which led to reduced hazardous fuels reduction, trail maintenance, and scientific research. It asserts that the Forest Service must prioritize wildfire risk reduction, forest treatments for insect and disease, improved recreation, water resources, wildlife populations, and scientifically sound stewardship of forests and grasslands.

Section 3(c)

Limited Access for Inholdings in Federal Land

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This subsection dictates that any 'adequate access' provided by the Secretary of Agriculture to private inholdings within the specified Federal land (sections 16-21, 28-33 of T. 4 S., R. 82 W in White River National Forest) must be restricted. Access routes must have existed as of March 2023, remain unpaved, be seasonal, and be limited to specific uses under a special use permit designed to protect the National Forest System.

Section 3(d)

Prohibition on Year-Round Road and Utility Corridor Construction

prominently featuredstraightforward

This subsection explicitly prohibits the Secretary of Agriculture from approving, issuing, or even considering any easement, special use authorization, or other permission for a utility corridor or year-round road. This prohibition applies to the project described in the 'record of decision' (Berlaimont Estates Access Road, March 2023) or any substantially similar road access project on the specified Federal land within the White River National Forest.

Section 3(f)

Acquisition of Berlaimont Estates Parcel from Willing Sellers

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section directs the Secretary of Agriculture to acquire the 680-acre Berlaimont Estates parcel, to the maximum extent practicable, through purchase, exchange, or donation from any willing seller. It mandates coordination with the State of Colorado, Eagle County, and local land trusts to leverage non-Federal resources for this acquisition. A report on these efforts is due to Congress within 180 days. If acquired, the parcel will be incorporated into the White River National Forest for wildlife conservation and public enjoyment.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this