The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 4202·119th Congress·Introduced Mar 25, 2026

Mental Health Access and Provider Support Act of 2026

IntroducedHealthSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Barrasso, John [R-WY]
Committees
Finance Committee (primary)
Last action
Mar 25, 2026

Bottom line

The bill aims to improve access to mental health services under Medicare by increasing reimbursement rates for certain non-physician mental health providers.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Social Security Act to increase Medicare reimbursement rates for mental health services provided by clinical social workers, marriage and family therapists, and mental health counselors. Specifically, it raises the reimbursement rate for these providers from 75 percent to 85 percent of the fee schedule amount provided under section 1848 of the Social Security Act, effective January 1, 2027.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that increasing reimbursement rates for clinical social workers, marriage and family therapists, and mental health counselors will incentivize more providers to accept Medicare patients, thereby improving access to crucial mental health services for seniors and individuals with disabilities. They contend that current reimbursement rates are too low, creating a disincentive for providers and contributing to mental health care shortages.

Opponents contend

Critics might raise concerns about the potential increase in Medicare spending due to higher reimbursement rates, especially without a clear mechanism to offset these costs. They may also argue that simply increasing reimbursement does not guarantee improved access, as other systemic barriers to mental health care may persist.

The bill is very short and straightforward, making it highly accessible for a reader to understand its core changes quickly.

Section 2(a)

Increased Medicare Reimbursement for Mental Health Services

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends Section 1833(a)(1) of the Social Security Act to increase the Medicare reimbursement rate for services furnished by clinical social workers, marriage and family therapists, and mental health counselors. It changes the payment calculation from 75 percent to 85 percent of the fee schedule amount established under section 1848. This aims to provide higher compensation for these mental health professionals when treating Medicare beneficiaries.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupClinical Social Workers, Marriage and Family Therapists, and Mental Health CounselorsImpactIncreased income and financial incentive to participate in Medicare.MechanismHigher reimbursement rates for services provided.ScaleDirect financial benefit for all participating providers.
GroupMedicare BeneficiariesImpactPotentially improved access to mental health services.MechanismMore providers may accept Medicare, reducing wait times and increasing choice.ScaleBroad benefit to beneficiaries seeking mental health care.
GroupMedicare ProgramImpactIncreased expenditures.MechanismHigher per-service payments for mental health care.ScaleSystem-wide increase in costs for mental health services.

Supporters argue

Proponents argue that this increase is essential to ensure fair compensation for mental health professionals, aligning their reimbursement more closely with other healthcare providers. They believe it will help address the growing mental health crisis by encouraging more providers to serve the Medicare population, ultimately improving access and reducing disparities in care.

Critics contend

Opponents might contend that while the goal of improving access is laudable, a direct increase in reimbursement without corresponding cost-saving measures or evidence of improved outcomes could place undue financial strain on the Medicare program. They may argue for alternative approaches to enhance access that are more fiscally conservative.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the need to adequately compensate mental health providers and improve access for beneficiaries against the potential for increased costs to the Medicare program and federal budget. It highlights the tension between investing in healthcare infrastructure and maintaining fiscal responsibility.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this