The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 430·119th Congress·Introduced Feb 5, 2025

TICKET Act

IntroducedCommerceSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]
Committees
Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee (primary)
Last action
Feb 5, 2025

Bottom line

The TICKET Act aims to enhance transparency in event ticket pricing by requiring all-inclusive price disclosure and itemized fee breakdowns to consumers from both primary and secondary sellers.

What it actually does

This bill mandates that ticket issuers and secondary market ticket issuers clearly and conspicuously display the total event ticket price, including all fees, in any advertisement or price list. It requires this total price to be disclosed at the first display of the ticket and throughout the purchasing process, along with an itemized list of the base ticket price and each individual fee.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill empowers consumers by eliminating hidden fees and surprise charges, allowing them to make informed purchasing decisions and fostering a more transparent marketplace for event tickets. They contend it addresses a common source of consumer frustration and deceptive practices by ensuring the true cost is known upfront.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that mandating 'all-in' pricing could make initial ticket prices appear higher, potentially deterring some buyers or making price comparisons more difficult if different platforms present information differently. Some might also contend it imposes an undue regulatory burden on ticket sellers, especially smaller secondary market operators, requiring significant system changes.

The bill is very concise and clearly written, making it highly accessible for readers to understand and evaluate within a short timeframe.

Section 3

All-Inclusive Ticket Price Disclosure

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section makes it unlawful for primary and secondary ticket sellers to offer event tickets unless they clearly and conspicuously display the total event ticket price, including all fees, in any advertisement, marketing, or price list. It further requires that this total price be disclosed at the time the ticket is first shown to a potential buyer and throughout the purchasing process. Additionally, sellers must provide an itemized list detailing the base ticket price and each specific event ticket fee.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupEvent Ticket Purchasers/ConsumersImpactIncreased transparency and clarity in pricing, enabling more informed purchasing decisions.MechanismMandates 'all-in' pricing and itemized fee disclosure, eliminating hidden charges.ScaleAffects all consumers purchasing tickets for events with capacity over 200 persons that are promoted in interstate commerce.
GroupTicket Issuers (Primary Sellers)ImpactIncreased compliance burden, potential need for changes in pricing display systems and marketing strategies.MechanismRequires system modifications to display all-inclusive pricing and itemized fees upfront.ScaleAffects all primary ticket sellers operating in interstate commerce.
GroupSecondary Market Ticket Issuers (Resellers)ImpactIncreased compliance burden, potential need for changes in pricing display systems and marketing strategies.MechanismRequires system modifications to display all-inclusive pricing and itemized fees upfront.ScaleAffects all secondary ticket sellers operating in interstate commerce.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision directly addresses widespread consumer frustration with hidden fees, allowing buyers to see the true cost upfront and compare prices more effectively across different platforms. They contend it promotes fairness, prevents deceptive pricing practices, and builds trust in the ticketing market.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that requiring all fees to be bundled into the initial displayed price could make tickets appear more expensive at first glance, potentially discouraging impulse purchases. Some might also contend that itemizing every minor fee adds unnecessary clutter without significant consumer benefit, or that it creates a substantial technical and administrative burden for platforms, particularly smaller ones.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances the consumer desire for clear, upfront pricing against potential concerns from ticket sellers regarding the initial perception of higher prices and the operational challenges of implementing new display requirements across diverse ticketing systems.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this