The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 4350·119th Congress·Introduced Apr 21, 2026

Southeast New England Program Authorization Act of 2026

IntroducedEnvironmental ProtectionSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Reed, Jack [D-RI]
Committees
Environment and Public Works Committee (primary)
Last action
Apr 21, 2026

Bottom line

The bill creates a new, federally funded EPA program to support environmental protection and restoration projects in the coastal watersheds of Rhode Island and southeastern Massachusetts.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to establish the Southeast New England Program within the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The program is designed to protect, enhance, and restore coastal watersheds in Rhode Island and southeastern Massachusetts by providing grants for various environmental projects, including pollution reduction, habitat restoration, water quality improvement, and stormwater runoff reduction. It authorizes $30 million annually for five fiscal years (2027-2031) for these efforts.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that the bill provides crucial, dedicated federal funding to address the unique environmental challenges facing the coastal watersheds of Southeast New England. They contend that a focused regional program will enable more effective collaboration among state, local, tribal, and non-profit entities, leading to tangible improvements in water quality, ecosystem health, and coastal resilience, which are vital for both environmental well-being and regional economies.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that establishing a new, geographically specific federal program could lead to an expansion of federal bureaucracy and potentially duplicate efforts of existing environmental programs or state-level initiatives. Concerns could also be raised about the allocation of federal funds to a specific region, suggesting that a broader, national approach to water quality funding might be more equitable or efficient in addressing environmental needs across the country.

The bill is very short and clearly written, making it highly accessible for a reader to understand its core provisions and implications within a short timeframe.

Section 2, adding FWPCA Section 127(b) and (c)

Establishment and Purpose of the Southeast New England Program

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision formally establishes the 'Southeast New England Program' (Program) within the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Its stated purpose is to protect, enhance, and restore the coastal watersheds of Rhode Island and southeastern Massachusetts by developing, funding, and advancing the implementation of protection and restoration projects through collaboration with regional partners. This creates a dedicated federal initiative for this specific geographic area.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)ImpactNew program responsibility and administrative dutiesMechanismDirect mandate to establish and manage the ProgramScaleSignificant
GroupCoastal watersheds of Rhode Island and southeastern MassachusettsImpactTargeted environmental protection and restoration effortsMechanismFocus of the Program's activitiesScaleRegional

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that a dedicated program ensures focused attention and resources for a critical ecological region, allowing for tailored strategies that address specific local environmental challenges more effectively than broader national programs.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against the establishment of a program's purpose itself, though critics of federal spending might question the necessity of creating a new program rather than utilizing or expanding existing frameworks.

Tradeoffs

The tension lies between creating a highly focused, potentially more effective regional program and the administrative overhead of establishing a new federal entity versus integrating efforts into existing, broader environmental initiatives.

Section 2, adding FWPCA Section 127(d)

Grant Program for Protection and Restoration Projects

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section authorizes the EPA Administrator to award grants to various eligible entities, including states, local governments, tribes, non-profits, and higher education institutions, for projects within the defined coastal watersheds. These projects can include pollution reduction, site restoration, ecosystem protection, water quality improvement, stormwater runoff reduction, resilience promotion, workforce development, and technical assistance. The federal share for these grants is capped at 75 percent, requiring a local match.

Section 2, adding FWPCA Section 127(g)

Authorization of Appropriations

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section authorizes the appropriation of $30,000,000 for the Program for each of fiscal years 2027 through 2031, totaling $150 million over five years. These funds are to remain available until expended. It also sets limits on how these funds can be used: not more than 10 percent of grant amounts can be for technical assistance, and not more than 5 percent of the total appropriated amounts can be used for administrative expenses.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this