The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 4533·119th Congress·Introduced May 14, 2026

Coast Guard Personnel Equipment Act

IntroducedArmed Forces and National SecuritySubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Graham, Lindsey [R-SC]
Committees
Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee (primary)
Last action
May 14, 2026

Bottom line

This bill expands existing "Buy American" provisions to include the U.S. Coast Guard, mandating domestic sourcing for specified personnel equipment.

What it actually does

This bill amends Section 4862 of title 10, United States Code, to explicitly extend existing "Buy American" requirements for certain articles—such as food, clothing, tents, and tools—to the U.S. Coast Guard. It clarifies that these requirements apply to the Coast Guard whether it is operating under the Department of Defense or, as is more common, under the Department of Homeland Security. The aim is to ensure that the Coast Guard, like other branches of the Armed Forces, prioritizes American-made goods for its personnel equipment.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this legislation strengthens the domestic manufacturing base, supports American jobs, and enhances national security by reducing reliance on foreign supply chains for critical equipment used by Coast Guard personnel. They contend it ensures consistency in procurement policy across all branches of the Armed Forces, promoting economic resilience and strategic independence.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that mandating domestic sourcing could increase procurement costs for the Coast Guard by limiting competition and potentially forcing the purchase of more expensive domestic goods when cheaper, equally effective foreign alternatives are available. This could strain the Coast Guard's budget, potentially leading to delays in acquiring necessary equipment or diverting funds from other critical operational areas.

The bill text is exceptionally short and clear, allowing for a complete understanding of its provisions in a very short amount of time.

Section 2, amending 10 U.S.C. 4862

Expanding 'Buy American' Requirements to the Coast Guard

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision modifies existing law (10 U.S.C. 4862) to explicitly include the U.S. Coast Guard under the "Buy American" requirements for certain articles, such as food, clothing, tents, and tools. It clarifies that these requirements apply whether the Coast Guard is operating as a service in the Navy (under the Department of Defense) or, more commonly, under the Department of Homeland Security. This ensures that the Coast Guard, like other branches of the Armed Forces, prioritizes American-made goods for its personnel equipment, and specifies that the Secretary of Homeland Security will consult with the Secretary of Defense on these matters.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupU.S. Coast GuardImpactMandates domestic sourcing for certain equipment, potentially affecting procurement costs and supply chain management.MechanismAmends 10 U.S.C. 4862 to include 'any branch of the Armed Forces' and specifically mentions the Coast Guard and the Secretary of Homeland Security in relevant subsections.ScaleApplies to all relevant procurement by the Coast Guard for specified articles.
GroupDomestic manufacturers and suppliersImpactIncreased demand and preferential treatment for their products, potentially leading to business growth and job creation.MechanismFederal procurement preference for American-made goods.ScalePotentially significant for specific industries supplying the Coast Guard.
GroupTaxpayersImpactPotential for higher federal expenditures due to restricted competition in procurement.MechanismIncreased costs for goods purchased by the Coast Guard.ScalePotentially minor to moderate, depending on market conditions and price differentials.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision strengthens the domestic industrial base, creates and sustains American jobs, and enhances national security by reducing reliance on foreign supply chains for essential equipment used by Coast Guard personnel. It also harmonizes procurement policies across all branches of the Armed Forces, ensuring a consistent approach to national security sourcing.

Critics contend

Critics might contend that this provision could lead to increased costs for the Coast Guard by limiting competition and potentially forcing them to purchase more expensive domestic goods when cheaper, equally effective foreign alternatives are available. This could strain the Coast Guard's budget and potentially delay procurement of critical items.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the goal of supporting domestic industry and enhancing national security through supply chain resilience against the potential for higher procurement costs and reduced flexibility for the Coast Guard in its purchasing decisions.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this