The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 4575·119th Congress·Introduced May 19, 2026

SMART Community Policing Act

IntroducedCrime and Law EnforcementSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Bennet, Michael F. [D-CO]
Committees
Judiciary Committee (primary)
Last action
May 19, 2026

Bottom line

The bill expands federal funding eligibility for community policing programs that integrate mental health and crisis response services with law enforcement.

What it actually does

This bill, the SMART Community Policing Act, amends the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to expand the authorized uses of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) funds. It specifically allows these funds to be used for establishing or expanding mobile crisis team programs, co-responder programs, and case management and outreach teams. These programs aim to improve responses to individuals experiencing mental health crises, substance use disorders, poverty, or homelessness by integrating mental health professionals and paramedics with law enforcement efforts.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill will lead to better outcomes for individuals in crisis by providing appropriate mental health and support services, rather than relying solely on law enforcement. They contend that it will de-escalate interactions, reduce repeat emergency service calls, and build stronger community partnerships, ultimately improving public safety and the well-being of vulnerable populations.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that while the intent is good, simply expanding authorized uses for existing COPS funds without a corresponding increase in appropriations may dilute resources for traditional policing functions. Some may also raise concerns about the practical challenges of integrating diverse professionals and ensuring consistent training and standards across different jurisdictions, potentially leading to varied effectiveness.

The bill is short and clearly written, making it accessible for a quick and informed evaluation by any interested reader.

Section 3, Paragraph (26)

Mobile Crisis Team Program Authorization

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision authorizes the use of COPS funds to establish or expand mobile crisis team programs. These teams would consist of skilled mental health professionals and paramedics who can respond to 911 calls at the request of law enforcement or directly to community members. Their role is to stabilize encounters, secure mental health services, and provide further evaluation and treatment for individuals experiencing mental or behavioral health crises. The funds can also be used for training law enforcement officers who partner with these teams and for mobile units.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupIndividuals experiencing mental/behavioral health crisesImpactImproved access to specialized care, de-escalation of encounters, reduced reliance on law enforcement for mental health issues.MechanismDirect response by mental health professionals and paramedics.ScaleLocal communities implementing these programs.
GroupLaw enforcement officersImpactReduced burden for non-violent mental health calls, enhanced training, improved community relations.MechanismPartnership with mental health professionals, specialized training.ScaleDepartments participating in the program.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that mobile crisis teams are a more appropriate and effective response to mental health emergencies than traditional law enforcement alone, leading to better outcomes for individuals and reducing potential for escalation. They highlight the benefit of specialized expertise in crisis situations.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against the concept of mobile crisis teams, as they are generally seen as a positive step towards more humane and effective crisis intervention. Concerns, if any, often relate to funding adequacy or implementation challenges rather than the concept itself.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the need for immediate crisis response with the specialized care required for mental health issues. The tension lies in ensuring seamless coordination between law enforcement and mental health teams, and adequately funding both personnel and mobile resources.

Section 3, Paragraph (27)

Co-Responder Program Authorization

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision allows COPS funds to be used for establishing or expanding co-responder programs. In these programs, a trained law enforcement officer is paired with a behavioral health clinician or paramedic. Their joint role is to de-escalate situations involving mental health crises, connect individuals with appropriate services, and provide effective responses to those with mental illness. The funds can also cover additional personnel, including more law enforcement officers and case managers, to support these teams.

Section 3, Paragraph (28)

Case Management and Outreach Team Authorization

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision authorizes the use of COPS funds for establishing or expanding case management and outreach teams. These teams are designed to follow up with individuals who have experienced a mental or behavioral health crisis, connecting them with ongoing mental health services and community resources. They also help individuals adhere to treatment plans and meet other responsibilities like work or school. A key function is to develop specific solutions for frequent users of emergency services to reduce repeat interactions with law enforcement or crisis teams. These teams can operate independently or as part of mobile crisis or co-responder programs.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this