The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 4604·119th Congress·Introduced May 20, 2026

Protecting America’s Small Oil and Gas Producers and Rural Jobs Act

IntroducedTaxationSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Marshall, Roger [R-KS]
Committees
Finance Committee (primary)
Last action
May 20, 2026

Bottom line

The bill provides significant tax relief and incentives for small and independent oil and gas producers, particularly those operating marginal wells, by increasing their eligible depletion allowances and removing certain limitations.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to enhance tax benefits for certain oil and gas wells, primarily focusing on marginal properties and independent producers. It modifies the percentage depletion rate calculation for marginal wells, removes the taxable income limitation for depletion allowances on these properties, and doubles the daily depletable oil quantity for independent producers and royalty owners from 1,000 to 2,000 barrels.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill is crucial for supporting America's small and independent oil and gas producers, who often operate marginal wells that are more sensitive to economic fluctuations. They contend that these changes will help maintain domestic energy production, protect rural jobs, and ensure a stable supply of oil and gas, thereby enhancing energy security and reducing reliance on foreign sources. The PPI adjustment is seen as a necessary measure to account for rising production costs.

Opponents contend

Critics contend that this bill provides unnecessary tax breaks to the fossil fuel industry at a time when the nation should be transitioning to renewable energy sources. They argue that these provisions will further incentivize drilling and extraction, contributing to climate change and environmental degradation. Opponents also point out that such tax expenditures reduce federal revenue, potentially exacerbating the national debt or requiring cuts to other public services.

The bill text is concise and can be read quickly, but a full understanding of its implications requires familiarity with existing tax code provisions related to oil and gas depletion.

Section 2(a)

Percentage Depletion Rate Calculation Modified for Marginal Properties

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This provision changes how the percentage depletion rate is calculated for marginal oil and gas wells. It sets a base rate of 15% but allows it to increase by one percentage point for every whole dollar that the reference price of crude oil falls below $70, up to a maximum of 25%. Furthermore, the $70 threshold will be adjusted annually for inflation using the Producer Price Index for Drilling Oil and Gas Wells, ensuring the benefit keeps pace with rising costs for producers.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupOwners and operators of marginal oil and gas wellsImpactIncreased tax deductionsMechanismHigher percentage depletion rate when crude oil prices are low, and an inflation adjustment to the price threshold.ScalePotentially significant for eligible producers, especially during periods of lower oil prices or higher production costs.
GroupFederal government (tax revenue)ImpactDecreased tax revenueMechanismExpanded tax deductions for producers.ScaleLikely a moderate to significant reduction in federal tax receipts.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this modification provides crucial financial stability for marginal wells, which are often the first to become uneconomical during price downturns. The inflation adjustment ensures the tax benefit remains relevant over time, helping to sustain production and jobs in rural areas.

Critics contend

Critics contend that this provision is an unnecessary subsidy for fossil fuel production, insulating producers from market realities and encouraging continued extraction. They argue it represents a tax giveaway that disproportionately benefits the industry at the expense of public funds.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances the goal of supporting domestic energy production and rural economies with concerns about federal revenue loss and environmental impacts of fossil fuel extraction. It aims to stabilize a specific segment of the energy industry but does so through a tax expenditure.

Section 2(b)

Nonapplication of Taxable Income Limitation for Marginal Properties

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This section removes a significant limitation on the percentage depletion allowance for marginal oil and gas properties. Currently, the depletion deduction cannot exceed 50% of the taxpayer's taxable income from the property (or 100% for oil and gas). This amendment eliminates that income limitation specifically for depletion allowances claimed on marginal wells, allowing producers to deduct the full eligible amount regardless of their taxable income from that property.

Section 2(c)

Depletable Oil Quantity Calculation Modified

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision increases the daily depletable oil quantity for independent producers and royalty owners from 1,000 barrels to 2,000 barrels. This quantity represents the maximum average daily production of domestic crude oil or natural gas for which these taxpayers can claim percentage depletion. By doubling this limit, more of an independent producer's or royalty owner's production becomes eligible for the percentage depletion allowance.

FOUND

The bill introduces a Producer Price Index (PPI) adjustment for the $70 reference price used in calculating the applicable percentage for marginal properties, starting in calendar year 2027. This adjustment ties the threshold to the 'Producer Price Index for Drilling Oil and Gas Wells' as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Section 2(a)(C)(ii)

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice for indexing provisions to inflation, ensuring the policy's intended effect is maintained over time without requiring constant legislative updates. It's a technical mechanism rather than an attempt to conceal.

Case for: Proponents argue that indexing the $70 threshold to the PPI for drilling oil and gas wells is essential to ensure the tax benefit remains effective in the face of inflation and rising production costs. Without it, the real value of the incentive would erode over time.

Case against: Opponents might argue that this automatic adjustment further entrenches the tax break and makes it less subject to periodic review. They could contend it provides an open-ended subsidy that grows with industry costs, regardless of broader economic or environmental policy goals.

Estimated impact: This adjustment will likely increase the long-term cost of the tax expenditure to the federal government as the $70 threshold rises with inflation, making the higher depletion rates more frequently applicable or more generous.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this