The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 4615·119th Congress·Introduced May 20, 2026

Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027

Senate Committee Report FiledArmed Forces and National SecurityOmnibus
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Cotton, Tom [R-AR]
Committees
Intelligence (Select) Committee
Last action
Aug 5, 2026

Bottom line

This bill is a comprehensive annual authorization for U.S. intelligence operations, significantly restructuring parts of the intelligence community and introducing new policies, particularly concerning AI, foreign technology, and intelligence sharing protocols.

What it actually does

This bill authorizes appropriations for fiscal year 2027 for intelligence and intelligence-related activities, the Intelligence Community Management Account, and the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System. Beyond funding, it enacts significant policy changes, including organizational restructuring within the Intelligence Community (IC), new protocols for intelligence sharing and declassification, prohibitions on certain foreign technologies, and a comprehensive framework for artificial intelligence governance and security across IC elements.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue the bill strengthens national security by ensuring critical funding for intelligence operations, modernizing the intelligence community's structure, enhancing its ability to counter evolving threats like hostile foreign cyber actors and AI risks, and improving intelligence sharing with key allies while safeguarding sensitive information. They contend it streamlines bureaucracy and adapts the IC to a rapidly changing global threat landscape.

Opponents contend

Critics might contend that some provisions could lead to overreach or unintended consequences, such as potential impacts on civil liberties from new data sharing protocols or the complexity of implementing numerous organizational changes. Concerns could also be raised about the scope of certain prohibitions on foreign technology, the potential for bureaucratic inefficiencies from new offices or task forces, or the reduction of congressional oversight through the repeal of certain reporting requirements.

The bill is lengthy and highly technical, requiring significant time for a thorough review, which may be challenging given typical legislative timelines for omnibus measures.

Sec. 101, Title I

Authorization of Appropriations for Intelligence Activities

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section broadly authorizes funds to be appropriated for fiscal year 2027 for all intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the Federal Government. The specific amounts are detailed in a classified schedule, ensuring the necessary financial resources for the Intelligence Community's operations.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupIntelligence Community AgenciesImpactReceives funding for operationsMechanismDirect appropriation authorizationScaleBroad, covering all IC activities
GroupU.S. TaxpayersImpactFunds these activitiesMechanismGeneral tax revenueScaleNational

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this authorization is essential for maintaining the nation's intelligence capabilities, enabling agencies to address evolving threats and protect national security interests.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against the general authorization of intelligence funds, though debates often occur over the specific amounts and programs in the classified schedule.

Tradeoffs

The primary tension is between the need for robust intelligence funding and fiscal responsibility, with specific details often debated in classified settings.

Sec. 103, Title I

Intelligence Community Management Account Authorization

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section specifically authorizes $568,000,000 for the Intelligence Community Management Account (ICMA) for fiscal year 2027, with additional classified amounts. The ICMA funds the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) and other IC-wide initiatives, supporting oversight, integration, and management functions across the intelligence community.

Sec. 201, Title II

Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System Authorization

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section authorizes $514,000,000 to be appropriated for the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability Fund for fiscal year 2027. This funding ensures the solvency and continued operation of the retirement and disability system for CIA personnel.

Sec. 301, Title III

Redesignation and Restructuring of DNI Leadership

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section redesignates the 'Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence' as the 'Deputy Director of National Intelligence' and eliminates other Deputy Director positions, establishing instead an 'Assistant Director of National Intelligence for Mission Integration' and an 'Assistant Director of National Intelligence for Policy and Capabilities.' These new Assistant Directors are appointed by the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), rather than the President with Senate consent.

Sec. 303, Title III

Repeal of Various IC Positions, Units, and Councils

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section repeals several existing positions, units, centers, councils, and offices within the Intelligence Community, including the Intelligence Community Chief Data Officer, the Intelligence Community Innovation Unit, the Climate Security Advisory Council, the Framework for Cross-Disciplinary Education and Training, the Foreign Languages Program, and the Joint Intelligence Community Council. These repeals aim to streamline the IC's structure and eliminate entities deemed redundant or ineffective.

Sec. 304, Title III

Transfer of National Intelligence University

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section mandates the transfer of the functions of the National Intelligence University (NIU) to the National Defense University (NDU) and repeals the subtitle of the National Security Act of 1947 that established NIU. This consolidates intelligence education under the broader defense education framework.

Sec. 305, Title III

Limitation on Domestic Activities at the National Counterterrorism Center

buried in fine printmoderately complex

This provision amends the National Security Act of 1947 to clarify that the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) may only receive and retain intelligence pertaining to domestic terrorism to the extent necessary to enable its focus on international terrorism. It explicitly limits NCTC's domestic activities to supporting its international terrorism mission.

Sec. 506, Title V

Modification of Responsibilities of Office of Intelligence and Analysis (DHS)

prominently featuredhighly complex

This section significantly modifies the responsibilities of the Department of Homeland Security's Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A). It reorients I&A's mission to focus solely on foreign threats to the homeland, explicitly prohibiting it from engaging in the collection of information or intelligence targeting any 'United States person' or any clandestine collection. It also streamlines I&A's liaison and information sharing functions.

Sec. 602, Title VI

Procedures for Dissemination of Nonpublicly Available Information Concerning United States Persons (Unmasking)

prominently featuredhighly complex

This section establishes detailed, standardized procedures for all Intelligence Community elements to respond to 'unmasking requests' – requests to reveal the identity of a U.S. person whose information was minimized in an intelligence report. It mandates written justifications, specific approval levels, record retention, and congressional notification for requests involving transition teams, nominees, or federal office holders. It also includes an exception for exigent circumstances.

Sec. 603, Title VI

Analytic Standards for All-Source Intelligence Products

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section establishes comprehensive analytic standards for all-source intelligence products across the Intelligence Community. These standards cover objectivity, independence from political considerations, timeliness, reliance on all relevant information, and detailed analytic tradecraft (sourcing, uncertainty, distinguishing judgments from assumptions, analysis of alternatives, relevance, argumentation, analytic line, accuracy, and visuals). It also requires a dedicated section in most products explaining tradecraft and mandates metrics for tracking adherence to these standards.

Sec. 606, Title VI

Establishment of Intelligence Community Counterintelligence Office at the Department of Commerce

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section directs the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) to establish an Intelligence Community Counterintelligence Office within the Department of Commerce. This office, led by a DNI-appointed Director and a Commerce-appointed Deputy Director, will advise the Secretary of Commerce on counterintelligence and intelligence information, identify and mitigate threats, and facilitate information sharing between Commerce and the IC. It aims to enhance the counterintelligence posture of the Department of Commerce.

Sec. 610, Title VI

Prohibition on Intelligence Community Use of Adversary Unmanned Ground Vehicles

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section prohibits elements of the Intelligence Community from procuring or operating covered unmanned ground vehicle systems (UGVs) manufactured or assembled by entities from covered foreign countries (China, Russia, Iran, North Korea). It includes exemptions for specific purposes like research, testing, counterterrorism, or if the UGV is modified to prevent data transfer to foreign entities and poses no cybersecurity risks. The prohibition on operation takes effect one year after enactment.

Sec. 611, Title VI

China-Taiwan Strategic Warning Task Force

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section establishes the China-Taiwan Strategic Warning Task Force, co-chaired by the DNI and the Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security. Its objectives are to synchronize IC efforts for indications and warning of Chinese military aggression against Taiwan, coordinate analysis, and develop IT solutions for information access. The Task Force has specific membership from key IC elements and a sunset clause of 5 years.

Sec. 614, Title VI

Biological Intelligence Activities of the Intelligence Community

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section mandates the DNI, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, to determine which U.S. agencies would benefit from anonymized biological data and intelligence, and to disseminate such information to them. It requires the establishment of standards for collection and data formats, minimizing collection of U.S. person biological data, and facilitating unified access to biological intelligence databases. The DNI must prioritize capabilities for early detection, characterization, and attribution of biological threats.

Sec. 620, Title VI

Intelligence Activities Related to Ukraine

prominently featuredhighly complex

This section amends the Support for the Sovereignty, Integrity, Democracy, and Economic Stability of Ukraine Act of 2014 to explicitly state U.S. policy to assist Ukraine in maintaining a credible defense and deterrence capability, including through intelligence support. It mandates continued intelligence support to Ukraine until an armistice or settlement, with strict notification requirements for any pauses or downgrades. It also outlines requirements for adjusting support in the event of a settlement or resuming full support if a settlement is violated, including early warning notifications to Ukraine and NATO members.

Sec. 622, Title VI

United States-Israel Intelligence Sharing Enhancement

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section establishes U.S. policy to strengthen intelligence sharing and analytic cooperation with Israel and Abraham Accords countries. It mandates the President to expand and enhance intelligence sharing on cybersecurity, terrorism, proliferation, and other threats, with limitations on reducing sharing except for specific national security concerns and requiring congressional notification for any changes. It also directs enhanced cooperation with Abraham Accords countries on shared security concerns, with safeguards for intelligence sources and methods.

Sec. 701, Title VII

Artificial Intelligence Exploitation Guard and Intelligence Sharing Pilot Program

prominently featuredhighly complex

This section establishes a 3-year pilot program, led by the NSA's Artificial Intelligence Security Center, to securely share intelligence and threat information with covered non-Federal persons (U.S. citizens/entities developing AI models or critical infrastructure for IC/DoD). The program aims to address the exploitation of U.S. AI systems by foreign adversaries for intelligence collection, IP theft, and malicious activities, with strict rules on participation, information handling, permissible use, and nondisclosure, while safeguarding privacy and civil liberties.

Sec. 702, Title VII

DNI Review of IC Use of AI to Support Targeting

prominently featuredhighly complex

This section mandates the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) to review and assess IC policies, procedures, and workflows governing the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in producing or reviewing intelligence that informs targeting decisions with lethal effects. It requires an exploratory analysis of AI bias and errors, consultation with relevant IC heads, and the issuance of new policies and directives to improve risk mitigation. A report to Congress detailing these findings is also required.

Sec. 706, Title VII

Clear Labeling of Artificial Intelligence Outputs for Targeting Workflows

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section mandates the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) to establish a policy requiring clear labeling of outputs from any artificial intelligence (AI) system used in developing intelligence that could inform lethal targeting decisions. The labels must indicate that AI was used, identify the specific AI system/model, describe how it was used, and provide a point of contact for questions. This label must remain prominent and visible to all subsequent users within the IC.

Sec. 711, Title VII

Prohibition on Certain Artificial Intelligence Models on Intelligence Community Systems

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section prohibits the acquisition or use of any 'covered application' (AI models confirmed to fail NIST AI Risk Management Framework standards for 'obscene, degrading, and/or abusive content,' or legally determined to have generated child pornography or non-consensual intimate images) on national security systems operated by the IC or its contractors. It mandates removal of such applications within 180 days, allows for additional safeguards, and includes a national security/research waiver with congressional notification.

Sec. 803, Title VIII

Protection of Classified Information Relating to Budget Functions

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This section requires covered officials (including the DNI, Treasury Secretary, OMB Director, and IC element heads) to use secure systems for all budget-related activities under the National Intelligence Program (NIP) by September 30, 2028. It allows for waivers if non-secure systems are appropriate and pose no significant counterintelligence risk. It also permits modification or omission of information in public reports to protect classified budget details and amends the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 to exempt classified NIP information from public disclosure.

Sec. 808, Title VIII

Espionage Offenses Statute of Limitations

buried in fine printstraightforward

This section amends Chapter 213 of title 18, United States Code, to establish that an indictment for a violation of section 794 (gathering or delivering defense information to aid foreign government) or a conspiracy to violate such section may be found or instituted at any time without limitation. This removes the statute of limitations for these specific espionage offenses.

FOUND

Limits the National Counterterrorism Center's (NCTC) domestic activities, allowing it to receive and retain domestic terrorism intelligence only to enable its focus on international terrorism.

Sec. 305, Title III

Why it matters:This could be standard legislative practice for amending existing statutes, but the precise wording redefines a sensitive area of NCTC's mission, which could be politically significant.

Case for: Proponents argue this clarifies NCTC's role, preventing mission creep into domestic law enforcement and ensuring its focus on international threats, which is its core expertise.

Case against: Critics might argue that this strict delineation could create intelligence gaps, hindering the seamless sharing of information between international and domestic counterterrorism efforts, especially as threats often blur these lines.

Estimated impact: Significant impact on NCTC's operational scope and its coordination with domestic law enforcement agencies, potentially clarifying roles but also creating new coordination challenges.

FOUND

Prohibits the Department of Homeland Security's Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) from engaging in the collection of information or intelligence targeting any 'United States person' or any clandestine collection.

Sec. 506(i), Title V

Why it matters:While substantively significant, it's placed within a series of other amendments to I&A's functions, potentially obscuring its standalone importance as a major prohibition.

Case for: Proponents argue this is a crucial civil liberties protection, preventing a federal intelligence component from targeting U.S. citizens and ensuring its focus remains on foreign threats.

Case against: Critics might argue that such a broad prohibition could hamstring I&A's ability to identify and counter threats to the homeland that involve U.S. persons with foreign ties, creating potential intelligence blind spots.

Estimated impact: Major impact on DHS I&A's operational capabilities and a significant enhancement of privacy protections for U.S. persons regarding this specific agency.

FOUND

Limits the use of Intelligence Community Management Account funds to provide financial or in-kind support for analytic collaboration to certain think tanks: those receiving foreign government support (except Five Eyes) or any support from governments/military/intelligence services of China, Russia, North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, or Cuba.

Sec. 604, Title VI

Why it matters:This is a policy rider with significant implications for IC engagement with external research, potentially placed in a general authorities section to avoid direct scrutiny during appropriations debates.

Case for: Proponents argue this protects the integrity of IC analysis by preventing potential foreign influence on research funded by the U.S. intelligence community, especially from adversarial nations.

Case against: Critics might argue this could limit the IC's access to diverse, high-quality research and expertise, particularly from think tanks with legitimate international funding that do not pose a security risk, potentially hindering comprehensive analysis.

Estimated impact: Could significantly alter the landscape of IC-funded external research, potentially reducing collaboration with a broad range of think tanks and academics.

FOUND

Prohibits covered individuals (IC employees/contractors with security clearance) from participating in prediction markets on topics relating to nonpublic information they access through their IC role, both during employment and for two years after.

Sec. 615, Title VI

Why it matters:This is a specific personnel conduct rule, which might be overlooked within a broader authorization bill, but it addresses a novel ethical concern related to insider trading of intelligence information.

Case for: Proponents argue this is a necessary ethical safeguard to prevent the exploitation of classified or nonpublic intelligence for personal financial gain through prediction markets, maintaining the integrity of the IC.

Case against: No specific opposition is typically raised against preventing insider trading or exploitation of nonpublic information by intelligence personnel.

Estimated impact: Low direct fiscal impact, but significant ethical and conduct implications for IC personnel, reinforcing trust and preventing potential conflicts of interest.

FOUND

Amends federal parental bereavement leave to explicitly include instances of natural or spontaneous loss of an unborn child, such as miscarriage, stillbirth, or loss due to a pregnancy emergency (e.g., ectopic pregnancy).

Sec. 809, Title VIII

Why it matters:This is a significant federal personnel policy change that is entirely unrelated to intelligence activities, making it a classic policy rider attached to a must-pass bill.

Case for: Proponents argue this provides essential support and compassion for federal employees experiencing profound loss, recognizing the emotional impact of pregnancy loss and aligning federal policy with modern understanding of bereavement.

Case against: No specific opposition is typically raised against expanding bereavement leave for pregnancy loss, as it is widely seen as a humane and supportive policy.

Estimated impact: Potentially increased administrative costs for federal agencies to manage expanded leave, and a positive impact on the well-being and morale of affected federal employees.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
  • Riders
  • Tactical maneuvers
  • Process critique
  • Transparency
Ask Ledger AI about this