The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 4760·119th Congress·Introduced Jun 11, 2026

A bill to amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes.

IntroducedArmed Forces and National SecurityMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Cotton, Tom [R-AR]
Committees
Intelligence (Select) Committee (primary)
Last action
Jun 11, 2026

Bottom line

This bill enacts a very short, temporary extension of key foreign intelligence surveillance authorities, preventing their immediate expiration and allowing for continued congressional debate.

What it actually does

This bill amends the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the sunset date for Title VII authorities of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA), specifically Section 702, by seven days. The expiration date is moved from June 12, 2026, to June 19, 2026, preventing a lapse in these foreign intelligence surveillance authorities while Congress continues to deliberate on a longer-term solution.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that this brief extension is absolutely necessary to prevent a critical lapse in national security surveillance capabilities, allowing intelligence agencies to continue vital foreign intelligence collection without interruption. They emphasize that even a short lapse could create dangerous intelligence gaps, hindering efforts to protect the nation from foreign adversaries and terrorist threats.

Opponents contend

Opponents, while potentially acknowledging the need for some form of intelligence collection, would likely view this short extension as a tactic to delay meaningful reform or a robust public debate on FISA Section 702. They might contend that such stop-gap measures perpetuate concerns about civil liberties and privacy by avoiding comprehensive oversight and necessary programmatic changes.

The bill text is extremely short and can be read in under a minute, making it highly accessible for immediate understanding of its direct action.

Section 1(a)

Extension of FISA Section 702 Authorities

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision modifies Section 403(b) of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, which dictates the expiration of Title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978. Specifically, it changes the repeal date from June 12, 2026, to June 19, 2026. This action grants a one-week extension to the government's authority to conduct surveillance on non-U.S. persons located outside the United States for foreign intelligence purposes, thereby preventing a temporary lapse in these powers.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupU.S. Intelligence Community (e.g., NSA, FBI)ImpactMaintains existing foreign intelligence collection capabilities for an additional seven days, preventing an operational pause.MechanismPrevents the sunset of legal authority for Section 702 surveillance.ScaleCritical for ongoing operations, but only for a very short duration, creating continued uncertainty for long-term planning.
GroupIndividuals targeted by foreign intelligence surveillance (non-U.S. persons abroad)ImpactContinued potential for surveillance under the existing legal framework for an additional week.MechanismExtension of the legal basis for surveillance activities.ScaleDirect impact on those targeted, but the extension itself is brief and maintains the status quo.
GroupU.S. persons whose communications may be incidentally collectedImpactContinued potential for incidental collection of communications under the existing legal framework for an additional week.MechanismExtension of the legal basis for surveillance activities, which includes rules for handling incidentally collected U.S. person data.ScaleIndirect impact, but the extension itself is brief and maintains the status quo regarding privacy safeguards.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this extension is crucial to avoid a lapse in critical foreign intelligence collection, which is vital for national security and protecting against terrorist threats, cyberattacks, and espionage. They contend that even a few days without these authorities could create dangerous intelligence gaps and compromise ongoing operations.

Critics contend

Critics of FISA Section 702, while not necessarily opposing this specific short-term extension to prevent a lapse, would argue that it delays necessary reforms to protect civil liberties and privacy. They contend that the program needs more robust oversight, greater transparency, and stricter limitations on the querying of U.S. person data.

Tradeoffs

The bill navigates the tension between maintaining continuous foreign intelligence collection capabilities for national security and addressing concerns about civil liberties and privacy associated with Section 702, albeit by punting the larger, more complex debate for a week. It prioritizes operational continuity over immediate reform.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this