The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 4780·119th Congress·Introduced Jun 15, 2026

A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude micro-grants for food security from gross income.

IntroducedTaxationSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Murkowski, Lisa [R-AK]
Committees
Finance Committee (primary)
Last action
Jun 15, 2026

Bottom line

This bill makes federal micro-grants aimed at improving food security tax-exempt for eligible recipient organizations, ensuring the full value of the grants supports their intended purpose.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to create a new section, 139M, which excludes micro-grants for food security from gross income. Specifically, it states that any subgrant or financial assistance received by an eligible entity under section 4206 of the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 (7 U.S.C. 7518) shall not be included in their gross income for tax purposes. The amendments apply to amounts received in taxable years beginning after the date of enactment.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this exclusion maximizes the impact of federal funding dedicated to combating food insecurity by ensuring that the full amount of micro-grants reaches the intended recipients. This reduces the financial and administrative burden on often small, community-based organizations, allowing them to dedicate more resources directly to food security initiatives rather than tax compliance.

Opponents contend

Critics might contend that while the intent is laudable, creating specific tax exclusions for particular grants can add complexity to the tax code and potentially reduce the federal tax base. They may also argue that existing tax provisions for non-profit organizations might already address much of this, making a specific exclusion less necessary, or that any reduction in federal revenue, however small, should be carefully weighed.

The bill is exceptionally short and clear, making it very accessible for any reader to understand its direct impact.

Section 1(a) and 1(b)

Exclusion of Micro-Grants for Food Security from Gross Income

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends Part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 by inserting a new section 139M. This new section clarifies that 'eligible entities,' as defined by the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 (7 U.S.C. 7518), will not have to include any subgrant or financial assistance received under that Act's food security micro-grant program in their gross income. This effectively makes these specific grants tax-exempt at the federal level.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupEligible entities receiving micro-grants for food securityImpactFinancial benefit; increased net value of grants, reduced tax liability.MechanismTax exclusion for specific grant income.ScaleDirectly impacts the financial resources available to these entities for food security initiatives, potentially increasing their operational capacity.
GroupFederal government (IRS, Treasury)ImpactPotential reduction in tax revenue.MechanismForegone tax revenue due to the exclusion.ScaleLikely minor given the 'micro-grant' nature, but the cumulative impact depends on the total volume and value of grants distributed under the referenced Act.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this exclusion ensures that every dollar of a food security micro-grant directly supports its intended purpose, rather than being diminished by taxation. This maximizes the effectiveness of federal funding aimed at combating food insecurity and reduces the administrative burden on small, often community-based, eligible entities.

Critics contend

Opponents might argue that while the goal is laudable, creating specific tax exclusions for particular grants can complicate the tax code and set precedents for other types of grants. They may also point to the potential, albeit likely small, reduction in federal tax revenue.

Tradeoffs

The primary tradeoff is between maximizing the direct impact of food security grants for recipients and maintaining a broader, simpler tax base. It balances the desire to support specific social programs with the general principle of taxing income, and the administrative ease for recipients versus potential tax code complexity.

FOUND

The bill defines 'eligible entity' and the specific grants covered by cross-referencing subsection (b)(1) of section 4206 of the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 (7 U.S.C. 7518). This means the scope of the tax exclusion is entirely dependent on the definitions and programs established in that external statute.

Section 1(a)

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice to avoid redundancy and ensure consistency with existing law. It is not intended to be evasive but requires external research for full comprehension.

Case for: Referencing existing law streamlines the bill and ensures that the tax exclusion applies precisely to the grants and entities already defined and targeted by the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, avoiding new, potentially conflicting definitions.

Case against: A reader unfamiliar with 7 U.S.C. 7518 would not immediately know the specific types of entities or grants covered, requiring additional research to fully grasp the bill's scope and who precisely benefits.

Estimated impact: The impact is limited to the scope and funding levels of the micro-grant program established under 7 U.S.C. 7518, which focuses on small-scale, local food security initiatives.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this