The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 4838·119th Congress·Introduced Jun 18, 2026

Outdoor Recreational Outfitting and Guiding Act

IntroducedLabor and EmploymentMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Daines, Steve [R-MT]
Committees
Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee (primary)
Last action
Jun 18, 2026

Bottom line

The bill exempts outdoor recreation outfitters and guides from federal minimum wage and overtime laws, potentially reducing labor costs for businesses in this sector but removing wage protections for their employees.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA) to create a new exemption from federal minimum wage and overtime pay requirements for employees working in outdoor recreational outfitting or guiding services. Specifically, it applies to employees primarily engaged in providing such services, including equipment rentals, when employed by businesses primarily engaged in these activities.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this exemption is crucial for the outdoor recreation industry, which often operates seasonally and in remote locations, making traditional wage and hour rules impractical. They contend it would reduce administrative burdens for small businesses, allow for more flexible scheduling, and help these businesses remain competitive and continue offering valuable recreational experiences. They might also argue that guides often receive tips and other benefits that compensate for non-traditional pay structures.

Opponents contend

Opponents would argue that this bill strips essential labor protections from a vulnerable workforce, potentially leading to lower wages and excessively long hours without fair compensation. They might contend that outdoor recreation employees, like all workers, deserve the basic protections of minimum wage and overtime, and that the industry should adapt its business model rather than seeking exemptions that could exploit workers.

The bill is extremely short and straightforward, making it very accessible for any reader to understand its core purpose quickly.

Section 2, amending Section 13(a) of the FLSA

Exemption for Outdoor Recreational Outfitting and Guiding Services Employees

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision adds a new category to the list of exemptions under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). It specifies that employees primarily involved in providing outdoor recreational outfitting (like renting equipment) or guiding services are not subject to federal minimum wage and overtime pay requirements. This exemption only applies if their employer is also primarily engaged in providing these types of outfitting or guiding services.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupEmployees in outdoor recreational outfitting and guiding servicesImpactLoss of federal minimum wage and overtime protectionsMechanismDirect amendment to FLSA Section 13(a)ScalePotentially affects thousands of seasonal and full-time employees across the outdoor recreation industry
GroupEmployers in outdoor recreational outfitting and guiding servicesImpactReduced labor costs and increased flexibility in scheduling and compensationMechanismDirect amendment to FLSA Section 13(a)ScaleBenefits businesses of all sizes in the outdoor recreation sector

Supporters argue

Proponents argue this exemption is vital for the economic viability of outdoor recreation businesses, many of which are small, seasonal operations in rural areas. They contend it allows for flexible compensation structures, including tips, and acknowledges the unique nature of the work, which often involves irregular hours and a focus on customer experience over strict hourly wages.

Critics contend

Opponents argue that this provision creates a carve-out that deprives workers in a specific industry of fundamental labor rights. They contend it could lead to exploitation, with employees working long hours for sub-minimum wages, and that the industry should comply with standard labor laws rather than seeking special treatment.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the desire to support the economic flexibility and competitiveness of the outdoor recreation industry against the goal of ensuring fair wages and working conditions for employees. It highlights a tension between industry-specific operational needs and universal labor protections.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this