The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 4955·119th Congress·Introduced Jul 13, 2026

Gateway Arch National Park Boundary Revision Act of 2026

IntroducedPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Durbin, Richard J. [D-IL]
Committees
Energy and Natural Resources Committee (primary)
Last action
Sep 16, 2026

Bottom line

This bill makes a minor technical adjustment to the authorized acreage and official map for Gateway Arch National Park, along with a formal name update in the underlying statute.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Act of May 17, 1954, which established the Gateway Arch National Park (formerly Jefferson National Expansion Memorial). It formally updates the park's name within the statute and revises the authorized boundary, increasing the park's acreage from 100 acres to 102.18 acres. The bill also updates the reference map for the park's boundary to a newer version dated August 2023.

Proponents argue

Supporters would argue this bill provides a necessary technical update to accurately reflect the current or intended boundaries of Gateway Arch National Park, ensuring proper management and preservation of the site. They would emphasize that such adjustments are common for national parks to incorporate small, adjacent parcels for improved visitor access, resource protection, or operational efficiency, and that the name update harmonizes the statute with the park's official designation.

Opponents contend

Given the minor nature of the boundary adjustment and the formal name update, direct opposition to this specific bill is unlikely. Potential concerns, if any, might revolve around the specific parcels being added, such as their current use or ownership, or the process of acquisition, but the bill text itself does not provide details to fuel such arguments.

The bill is exceptionally short and clear, allowing for quick comprehension by any interested reader.

Section 2

Gateway Arch National Park Boundary Revision and Name Update

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends the original 1954 Act that established the park. It formally changes the name reference in the statute from "Jefferson National Expansion Memorial" to "Gateway Arch National Park," reflecting the current official name. More significantly, it increases the authorized acreage for the park from 100 acres to 102.18 acres and updates the reference map to a newer version dated August 2023. This allows for the inclusion of a small additional parcel of land into the park's official boundary.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupNational Park ServiceImpactExpanded jurisdiction and management responsibilitiesMechanismStatutory amendment to park boundaryScaleMinor increase in acreage (2.18 acres)
GroupVisitors to Gateway Arch National ParkImpactPotential for improved park facilities or accessMechanismInclusion of new land into the parkScaleLocalized, minor
GroupLandowners of the 2.18 acresImpactLand potentially acquired for park purposesMechanismStatutory authorization for boundary expansionScaleHighly specific to those landowners

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this revision ensures the park's statutory boundary accurately reflects its operational needs and current management plans, potentially allowing for the inclusion of critical adjacent lands for visitor services, resource protection, or interpretive programming. The name update also harmonizes the statute with the park's official designation.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against minor technical boundary adjustments for national parks, especially when they are small. Any potential opposition would likely be localized and specific to the particular parcel of land being added, such as concerns over property rights or local land use, but such details are not in the bill text.

Tradeoffs

The primary tension, if any, would be between the federal interest in expanding a national park for public benefit and any private property rights or local development interests associated with the specific 2.18 acres. However, such minor adjustments are often made with local consensus or through established land acquisition processes.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this