The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 5022·119th Congress·Introduced Jul 16, 2026

Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act

IntroducedCrime and Law EnforcementOmnibus
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Booker, Cory A. [D-NJ]
Committees
Finance Committee (primary)
Last action
Jul 16, 2026

Bottom line

The Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act aims to end federal cannabis prohibition, create a regulated marketplace, and invest in communities harmed by past drug policies, while also addressing public health and safety concerns.

What it actually does

This bill decriminalizes cannabis at the federal level by removing it from the Controlled Substances Act, retroactively expunging certain federal cannabis offenses, and establishing a comprehensive federal regulatory framework for cannabis products under the FDA and the newly renamed Alcohol, Tobacco, and Cannabis Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB). It also creates an Opportunity Trust Fund, funded by new federal cannabis taxes, to support communities disproportionately impacted by the War on Drugs through various grant programs, small business assistance, and restorative justice initiatives. Additionally, the bill mandates extensive research into cannabis's societal and health impacts, and addresses cannabis-impaired driving prevention.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that the bill rectifies historical injustices of the War on Drugs, which disproportionately affected communities of color, by expunging records and reinvesting tax revenues into these communities. They contend it establishes a sensible federal regulatory framework for a rapidly growing state-legal industry, ensuring product safety, preventing underage use, and addressing impaired driving. Proponents also highlight the economic benefits of a legal cannabis market, including job creation and tax revenue, and the importance of supporting small and minority-owned businesses in this new industry.

Opponents contend

Critics, if any, might raise concerns about the potential public health consequences of widespread cannabis legalization, including increased rates of cannabis use disorder, impaired driving incidents, and long-term health effects, particularly among youth. They might also question the effectiveness of the proposed regulatory and prevention measures, or argue that federal legalization could undermine state-level control over cannabis policy. Some may also express skepticism about the government's ability to effectively manage a new, complex regulated industry.

The bill is extensive and covers a wide range of policy areas, requiring significant time for a thorough review to understand its full implications across justice, health, economic, and regulatory sectors.

Sec. 101, Title I, Subtitle A

Decriminalization of Cannabis and Retroactive Application

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section removes cannabis and tetrahydrocannabinols in cannabis from Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act. It mandates the Attorney General to finalize this descheduling within 180 days and makes the amendments retroactive. This retroactivity applies to all offenses, pending cases, and convictions, requiring the government to drop relevant charges, dismiss pending cases, and release individuals serving sentences for federal cannabis offenses. It also allows for reduced sentences for those serving multiple sentences or whose sentencing was elevated due to prior cannabis convictions.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupIndividuals with federal cannabis convictionsImpactPositiveMechanismExpungement, release from incarceration, reduced sentencesScaleTens of thousands of individuals
GroupFederal criminal justice systemImpactTransformativeMechanismRequires dropping charges, vacating convictions, and releasing individualsScaleSignificant administrative and judicial workload

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this is a crucial step to correct historical injustices of the War on Drugs, which disproportionately harmed minority communities. Retroactivity ensures that those currently incarcerated or burdened by past convictions can benefit immediately from the new federal policy.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against the retroactive application of decriminalization once the policy itself is adopted, though some may argue for a more gradual implementation to manage administrative burdens.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the desire for immediate restorative justice with the administrative complexities of reviewing and processing a large number of past cases and releases.

Sec. 102, Title I, Subtitle A

Transferring Agency Functions and Redesignation of TTB

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section transfers federal cannabis enforcement functions from the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Department of the Treasury. It also renames the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) to the Alcohol, Tobacco, and Cannabis Tax and Trade Bureau (ATCTTB). HHS (through FDA) and Treasury (through ATCTTB) are mandated to enter into a memorandum of understanding to coordinate their regulatory responsibilities, aiming to reduce compliance burdens and administrative duplication.

Sec. 111, Title I, Subtitle B

States' Rights and Interstate Commerce

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section clarifies that cannabis transported into a state or territory will be subject to that state's or territory's laws upon arrival, regardless of its origin or packaging. It prohibits the shipment of cannabis into states where it is intended to be used or sold in violation of state law. However, it explicitly states that no state or Indian Tribe may prohibit the transportation or shipment of cannabis or cannabis products through its territory.

Sec. 202, Title II, Subtitle A

Biomedical Research on Cannabis

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section mandates the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation with the NIH Director, to conduct or support research on the impacts of cannabis. Research topics include effects on the human brain, efficacy for specific diseases (e.g., chronic pain, PTSD), impacts on pulmonary function, cardiovascular events, cancer, mental health conditions, and the identification of additional medical benefits and harms. It also specifies considering varying forms and delivery methods of cannabis. The section appropriates $200,000,000 annually for fiscal years 2026-2030 for this research.

Sec. 210, Title II, Subtitle A

VA Clinical Trials on Cannabis for Chronic Pain and PTSD

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This section requires the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to conduct clinical trials on medical-grade cannabis for veterans with chronic pain and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). For chronic pain, it evaluates impacts on pain intensity, opioid/benzodiazepine/alcohol use, inflammation, sleep, agitation, and quality of life. For PTSD, it assesses symptoms, benzodiazepine/alcohol use, mood, anxiety, social functioning, agitation, suicidal ideation, and sleep quality. The trials must study various cannabis forms and at least seven unique plant cultivars with different THC:CBD ratios. It also includes provisions for a long-term observational study and data preservation.

Sec. 224, Title II, Subtitle B

State Cannabis-Impaired Driving Prevention Grant Program

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This section establishes a grant program for states to implement programs preventing impaired driving due to cannabis use. Eligible activities include training public safety personnel to detect impairment, increasing toxicology testing capacity, developing assessment programs for recidivism risk, implementing high-visibility enforcement, and educating the public. States must agree to provide data for evaluation. The federal share for grants is 80% for the first three years, decreasing thereafter unless the state implements an open container law for cannabis products. It appropriates $45,000,000 annually for fiscal years 2026-2030.

Sec. 301, Title III, Subtitle A

Opportunity Trust Fund Programs (Community Reinvestment, Cannabis Restorative Opportunity, Equitable Licensing)

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section establishes three key programs funded by the Opportunity Trust Fund: the Community Reinvestment Grant Program (administered by a new Cannabis Justice Office within the Office of Justice Programs) for services like job training, reentry, and legal aid for individuals adversely impacted by the War on Drugs; the Cannabis Restorative Opportunity Program (SBA) providing loans and technical assistance to small businesses owned by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals in eligible states/tribes; and the Equitable Licensing Grant Program (SBA) for states/tribes to develop equitable cannabis licensing programs that minimize barriers for individuals adversely impacted by the War on Drugs. It appropriates significant funds for each program for fiscal years 2026-2030.

Sec. 303, Title III, Subtitle A

Availability of Small Business Administration Programs to Cannabis Businesses

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends the Small Business Act to ensure that cannabis-related legitimate businesses and cannabis-related service providers are eligible for various SBA programs and services. This includes access to Small Business Development Centers, Women's Business Centers, SCORE, Veteran Business Outreach Centers, Community Navigators Pilot Program, 7(a) loans, Disaster Loans, Microloans, Small Business Investment Company Debentures, and State or Local Development Company Loans. It explicitly prohibits the SBA or lenders from denying services or loans solely because a business is cannabis-related.

Sec. 311, Title III, Subtitle B

Resentencing and Expungement of Federal Cannabis Offenses

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section mandates each judicial district to conduct a comprehensive review within one year to expunge federal cannabis offense convictions and juvenile delinquency adjudications entered between May 1, 1971, and the bill's enactment date. It also requires expungement of associated arrests and notification to affected individuals. Individuals not serving a criminal sentence can petition for expungement at any time, with appointed counsel for indigent petitioners. Expunged records are sealed, and individuals can treat the offense as if it never occurred, with immunity from perjury for non-disclosure and no loss of federal benefits. An exception exists for those who received an aggravating role adjustment, unless mitigating factors warrant expungement.

Sec. 312, Title III, Subtitle B

No Discrimination in Federal Public Benefits or Security Clearances

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section prohibits the denial of any federal public benefit (as defined in 8 U.S.C. 1611(c)) based on cannabis use, possession, or a cannabis offense conviction/adjudication. It also states that a federal agency may not grant, deny, or rescind a security clearance solely based on past or present cannabis use.

Sec. 313, Title III, Subtitle B

No Adverse Effect for Immigration Laws

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This section specifies that for immigration purposes, cannabis will not be considered a controlled substance, and an alien cannot be denied any immigration benefit or protection based on any cannabis-related event (conduct, finding, admission, addiction, arrest, juvenile adjudication, or conviction), regardless of when it occurred. It also makes conforming amendments to the Immigration and Nationality Act, including allowing reconsideration of removal orders based on cannabis offenses and removing cannabis-related grounds for inadmissibility or deportability.

Sec. 401, Title IV

Creation of Opportunity Trust Fund and Imposition of Cannabis Taxes

prominently featuredhighly complex

This section establishes a new Chapter 56 in the Internal Revenue Code, imposing a federal excise tax on cannabis products. For the first five years, the tax is a percentage of the removal price (starting at 10% for the first two years, increasing to 25% by the fifth year). After five years, it transitions to an equivalent amount based on a rate per ounce for cannabis flower and a rate per gram for THC products, determined by the Secretary of the Treasury. The section also creates the 'Opportunity Trust Fund' in the Treasury, into which net revenues from these taxes are appropriated, and from which amounts equivalent to appropriations under the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act are paid to the general fund. A credit for qualified domestic manufacturers is also established, phasing in up to $5,000,000.

Sec. 501, Title V, Subtitle A

FDA Regulation of Cannabis Products and Center for Cannabis Products

prominently featuredhighly complex

This section establishes a new Chapter XI in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) to regulate cannabis products. It creates a Center for Cannabis Products within the FDA, responsible for implementing this chapter. It defines adulterated and misbranded cannabis products, sets annual registration requirements for manufacturers, and outlines general provisions for control, including restrictions on remote sales and advertising to minors, and good manufacturing practice requirements. It also mandates the FDA to adopt cannabis product standards covering ingredients, testing, labeling, and harmful constituents. A recall authority is also granted to the FDA.

Sec. 504, Title V, Subtitle A

Regulation of Cannabidiol (CBD)

mentioned in summaryhighly complex

This section amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to allow cannabidiol (CBD) derived from hemp to be treated as a dietary supplement. However, it introduces new adulteration criteria for CBD dietary supplements, requiring them to contain no more than a Secretary-established amount of CBD per daily serving, be subject to new dietary ingredient notifications, and conform to specific labeling/packaging requirements. The Secretary of HHS is mandated to issue draft guidance on evaluating CBD safety as a food additive and to convene an advisory committee before doing so.

Sec. 511, Title V, Subtitle B

Federal Cannabis Administration and Permit Requirements

prominently featuredhighly complex

This section amends the Federal Alcohol Administration Act to create a new Title III for cannabis, establishing a federal permit system for importing, manufacturing, packaging, warehousing, and wholesale resale of cannabis. Permits are issued by the Secretary of the Treasury (through ATCTTB) unless the applicant has a disqualifying felony conviction (post-enactment, within 3 years of application), violates state law, or is unlikely to conform to federal law. A waiver process for disqualifying offenses is included, with review by the Cannabis Products Advisory Committee. Permits are conditioned on compliance with federal and state laws, a permit fee (waivable for low-income first-time applicants), and compliance with specified labor laws (Fair Labor Standards Act, OSHA, National Labor Relations Act).

Sec. 606, Title VI

Grants for Community-Based Education, Outreach, and Enforcement for Cannabis Workers' Rights

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section authorizes the Secretary of Labor to award competitive grants to eligible non-profit entities (or partnerships thereof) to educate workers in the cannabis industry about their rights under federal, state, and local civil rights, labor, and employment laws. The grants also support educating employers on their obligations and connecting workers to additional services. Priority is given to low-wage workers. Grants are for up to 3 years and $300,000 each. It appropriates $15,000,000 annually for fiscal years 2026-2030.

Sec. 704, Title VII

Investment in Communities (CDFI, MDI, Housing Grants)

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section appropriates significant funds for community investment. It provides $200,000,000 annually for fiscal years 2026-2030 to the Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) Fund to expand lending and investment in low- or moderate-income areas, especially those affected by the War on Drugs. Another $200,000,000 annually for the same period is appropriated to the Emergency Capital Investment Fund to support Minority Depository Institutions (MDIs) in providing loans and grants to small businesses, minority-owned businesses, and consumers in underserved communities. Additionally, $300,000,000 annually for the same period is appropriated to HUD for grants to eligible grantees for housing and community development activities addressing the needs of individuals and census tracts adversely impacted by the War on Drugs.

Sec. 802, Title VIII

Cannabis Products Advisory Committee

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This section establishes a 22-member Cannabis Products Advisory Committee within HHS to advise relevant federal regulatory bodies on the administration of the Act. The committee's membership includes industry stakeholders (with a focus on underrepresented communities), equity advocates, state regulators, consumers, public health/science experts, public safety officials, and representatives from various federal agencies (ONDCP, VA, ATCTTB, DOT, HHS agencies) and labor unions, and Indian Tribes. The committee will consider matters submitted by the Secretary, recommend guidelines, review public health surveillance, identify research gaps, and make recommendations on permit waiver requests for disqualifying offenses. It will also publish annual reports.

Sec. 803, Title VIII

Definition of Hemp Under USDA Domestic Hemp Production Program

buried in fine printhighly complex

This section amends the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to redefine 'hemp.' It changes the definition from 'not more than 0.3 percent delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol on a dry weight basis' to 'not more than the allowable tetrahydrocannabinol equivalent amount' (1 milligram of total tetrahydrocannabinol per 100 grams on a dry weight basis, or 0.7 percent total tetrahydrocannabinol equivalent on a dry weight basis for specified plant products). 'Total tetrahydrocannabinol equivalent' includes delta-8, delta-9, delta-10 THC, and tetrahydrocannabinolic acid, with HHS, Treasury, and AG having authority to exclude isomers or modify amounts. This significantly tightens the definition of legal hemp, particularly impacting products with high concentrations of other THC isomers.

FOUND

Special Rule for Federal Employee Testing: While cannabis is generally not treated as an illegal drug for federal employee testing, an exception allows the Secretary of HHS or agency heads to deem cannabis a Schedule I controlled substance *exclusively for drug testing* of law enforcement officers or federal employees in positions with significant involvement in national security or public safety.

Sec. 101(e), Title I, Subtitle A

Why it matters:This is likely a politically sensitive compromise to address concerns about maintaining drug-free workplaces in critical federal roles, particularly law enforcement and national security, even after general decriminalization. It ensures that agencies retain discretion for safety-sensitive positions.

Case for: Proponents argue this exception is necessary to maintain public trust and operational integrity in sensitive federal positions where impairment could have severe consequences. It provides flexibility for agencies to uphold specific safety and security standards.

Case against: Critics might argue that this carve-out undermines the spirit of decriminalization and could lead to continued discrimination against federal employees who use cannabis legally in their personal time, especially if the definition of 'significant involvement' is broad.

Estimated impact: Maintains drug testing for cannabis in specific federal roles, potentially affecting thousands of federal employees and applicants in law enforcement, national security, and public safety.

FOUND

Personal Use Exception for Cannabis Producers: An individual is not treated as a 'producer' for tax purposes if they are solely involved in planting, cultivating, and growing cannabis for personal or family use, not for sale, within their dwelling or connected enclosure, and the quantity does not exceed personal use production limitations determined by the Secretary to protect public safety and revenue.

Sec. 5902(b)(2)(B), Title IV, Subchapter A (Internal Revenue Code)

Why it matters:It's a crucial detail for individuals who wish to grow cannabis for personal use without being subject to federal commercial regulations and taxes. Its placement ensures that the primary focus remains on commercial operations while quietly accommodating home cultivation.

Case for: Proponents argue this exception respects individual liberty and privacy, allowing personal cultivation without federal interference, similar to homebrewing alcohol. It prevents overreach of federal tax and regulatory authority into non-commercial activities.

Case against: Some might argue that any personal cultivation, even for non-commercial use, should be subject to some form of registration or oversight to prevent diversion to the illicit market or to ensure public safety standards are met, even at home.

Estimated impact: Exempts potentially millions of individuals who choose to grow cannabis for personal use from federal excise taxes and permitting requirements, reducing administrative burden for both individuals and the government.

FOUND

Redefinition of 'Hemp' and 'Total Tetrahydrocannabinol Equivalent': This section significantly alters the definition of 'hemp' under the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946. Instead of being defined by a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis, it introduces 'total tetrahydrocannabinol equivalent' (which includes delta-8, delta-9, delta-10 THC, and tetrahydrocannabinolic acid) and sets a new, much lower limit of 1 milligram per 100 grams on a dry weight basis for most products, or 0.7% for specified plant products. HHS, Treasury, and AG can modify these definitions.

Sec. 803, Title VIII

Why it matters:This provision addresses the 'delta-8 loophole' and other intoxicating hemp-derived products that have proliferated under the 2018 Farm Bill's definition of hemp. By redefining hemp to include all intoxicating THC isomers and setting a very low threshold, it effectively moves these products into the federally regulated cannabis market. Its technical nature helps to avoid direct political confrontation over banning specific popular products.

Case for: Proponents argue this closes a significant public health and safety loophole, preventing intoxicating products from being sold without the robust regulations (age limits, testing, labeling) that would apply to federally legal cannabis. It ensures consistency in federal policy regarding intoxicating cannabinoids.

Case against: Critics, particularly from the hemp industry, would argue this is a de facto ban on many popular hemp-derived products, destroying a multi-billion dollar industry that has developed under the current legal framework. They would contend it is an overreach that harms farmers and businesses who have invested in these products.

Estimated impact: Potentially reclassifies a significant portion of the existing hemp-derived cannabinoid market (e.g., delta-8 THC products) as federally regulated cannabis, leading to market consolidation, product discontinuation, or new compliance costs for manufacturers. This could be a multi-billion dollar impact on the hemp industry.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
  • Riders
  • Tactical maneuvers
  • Process critique
  • Transparency
Ask Ledger AI about this