The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 506·119th Congress·Introduced Feb 11, 2025

Coordinating Care for Senior Veterans and Wounded Warriors Act

IntroducedArmed Forces and National SecuritySubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Moran, Jerry [R-KS]
Committees
Veterans' Affairs Committee (primary)
Last action
Jul 30, 2025

Bottom line

This bill establishes a pilot program to streamline healthcare for veterans concurrently enrolled in both VA and Medicare systems through dedicated case managers and private sector partnerships.

What it actually does

This bill mandates the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, in consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, to establish a three-year pilot program. The program aims to improve care coordination, navigation, and management of benefits for veterans who are enrolled in both the Medicare program and the Department of Veterans Affairs' annual patient enrollment system. It seeks to enhance access, outcomes, and quality of care while reducing costs and eliminating service duplication.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that this bill addresses a critical need for veterans who often struggle to navigate the complexities of two distinct federal healthcare systems. They contend that improved coordination will lead to better health outcomes, higher quality of care, reduced costs, and eliminate frustrating gaps and duplications in services for a vulnerable population.

Opponents contend

Opponents might raise concerns about the administrative complexities and potential costs associated with establishing and running a new pilot program that requires extensive coordination between two large federal agencies and potentially private entities. They may also question the scalability of individualized case management and the effectiveness of integrating commercial models into the unique VA healthcare environment.

The bill is concise and easy to read, allowing for a quick understanding of its provisions.

Section 2(a)-(c)

Establishment and Administration of Pilot Program for Dual-Enrolled Veterans

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision requires the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, in consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, to establish a three-year pilot program. Its purpose is to coordinate, navigate, and manage care and benefits for veterans enrolled in both Medicare and VA healthcare. The program will operate in 3-5 Veterans Integrated Service Networks (VISNs), including rural and medically underserved areas, and aims to improve access, outcomes, quality, and reduce costs and service duplication.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupCovered veterans (dual-enrolled in VA and Medicare)ImpactImproved access to care, better health outcomes, higher quality of care, reduced costs, elimination of service gaps and duplication.MechanismCoordinated care management through a pilot program.ScaleDirectly impacts veterans participating in the selected VISNs.
GroupDepartment of Veterans Affairs (VA) and Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)ImpactIncreased administrative burden for coordination and implementation, potential for improved inter-agency collaboration.MechanismMandate to establish and consult on the pilot program.ScaleAffects operations within the Center for Innovation for Care and Payment and relevant offices.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this pilot program directly addresses the systemic fragmentation faced by veterans navigating two complex healthcare systems, leading to more holistic and efficient care. By focusing on specific VISNs, it allows for targeted improvements and data collection.

Critics contend

Critics might express concerns about the administrative overhead and initial costs of launching a new pilot program requiring extensive inter-agency coordination, potentially diverting resources from existing VA services.

Tradeoffs

The tension lies between the significant potential benefits of integrated care for veterans and the logistical and financial challenges of establishing a new, complex coordination program across federal agencies.

Section 2(d)-(e)

Assignment of Case Managers and Use of Existing Care Models

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section mandates that each veteran participating in the pilot program be assigned a case manager. This manager will develop an individualized needs assessment and a care coordination plan, assisting the veteran in navigating both the VA and Medicare systems. Furthermore, the Secretary is directed to design the pilot program using existing models, including value-based care models from commercial health care programs, to improve efficiency and outcomes.

Section 2(f)

Contracting with Private Sector Entities

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision requires the Secretary to contract with private sector entities, to the greatest extent practicable, to assist in designing, implementing, and managing the pilot program, including providing care coordination. If the Secretary determines that such contracting is not practicable, a detailed notification, justification, and an alternative plan must be submitted to the House and Senate Committees on Veterans' Affairs.

Section 2(g)-(i)

Performance Metrics, Duration, and Congressional Reporting

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision outlines the requirement for the Secretary to track various metrics for the pilot program, including veteran participation, reliance on VA/Medicare services, quality, cost, access, and patient/provider satisfaction. It also mandates tracking data related to service-connected disabilities, priority groups, care types, and veteran demographics. The pilot program is set for a three-year duration, with quarterly reports to Congress during the first two years, annual reports on results, and a final report with recommendations for extension or permanence.

FOUND

Defines 'covered veteran' as a veteran enrolled in both the Medicare program under title XVIII of the Social Security Act and the system of annual patient enrollment of the Department of Veterans Affairs under section 1705(a) of title 38, United States Code.

Section 2(j)(1)

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice to consolidate definitions at the end of a bill, ensuring clarity and avoiding repetition within the main text.

Case for: Supporters argue that this precise definition ensures the pilot program targets the specific population facing the most acute coordination challenges, focusing resources where they are most needed and allowing for a clear evaluation of impact on this group.

Case against: Critics might contend that this definition is overly narrow, potentially excluding other veterans who could benefit from improved coordination but do not meet the strict dual enrollment criteria (e.g., those with VA eligibility but not enrolled, or those with private insurance and VA).

Estimated impact: This definition directly determines the scope and target population of the entire pilot program, influencing its operational scale and potential costs.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this