The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 5068·119th Congress·Introduced Jul 22, 2026

Service Academy Parity Act

IntroducedTransportation and Public WorksMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Scott, Rick [R-FL]
Committees
Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee (primary)
Last action
Jul 22, 2026

Bottom line

The "Service Academy Parity Act" establishes a congressional nomination system for the Coast Guard Academy, aligning its appointment process with other U.S. federal service academies.

What it actually does

This bill amends Title 14, United States Code, to establish a formal congressional nomination and appointment process for cadets to the U.S. Coast Guard Academy, mirroring systems used by other service academies. It outlines specific categories for nominations, including those by the Vice President, Senators, House Members, Delegates, the Resident Commissioner, and the Commandant for enlisted Coast Guard members, and allocates positions accordingly starting in the 2029 academic year.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that this bill brings the Coast Guard Academy's cadet appointment process into parity with the other federal service academies (Army, Navy, Air Force), ensuring a more standardized and transparent selection method. They contend that involving Members of Congress in the nomination process will broaden the pool of qualified candidates, increase geographic representation, and strengthen congressional oversight and interest in the Coast Guard.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that introducing a congressional nomination system could politicize the Coast Guard Academy's admissions process, potentially prioritizing political connections over merit or the unique needs of the Coast Guard. They might also contend that the current merit-based system, which relies on a centralized application process, is more equitable and effective at identifying candidates best suited for Coast Guard service, and that adding a new layer of bureaucracy could complicate admissions without clear benefits.

The bill is short and its provisions are straightforward, making it highly accessible for a quick and informed review.

Section 2(a)(1)-(2)

Renaming and Restructuring Section 1922

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision renames Section 1922 of Title 14, United States Code, from "Appointments" to "Nominations and appointments" and restructures the existing text into a new subsection (a). This sets the stage for adding new subsections that detail the nomination process.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupLegislative drafters and legal scholarsImpactClarifies the scope of the section to include nominations.MechanismStatutory amendment to section heading and structure.ScaleMinor, foundational change.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this is a necessary technical amendment to accurately reflect the expanded scope of the section, which will now include nomination procedures in addition to appointments.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against such technical, structural amendments.

Tradeoffs

None apparent for this specific technical change.

Section 2(a)(3), adding subsection (b) to Section 1922

Eligibility for Nomination

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision establishes that an individual can only be nominated for a competitive appointment to the Coast Guard Academy if they are a U.S. citizen or national and meet minimum requirements set by the Secretary. This sets basic eligibility criteria for all nominees under the new system.

Section 2(a)(3), adding subsection (c) to Section 1922

Authorized Nominating Authorities

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision designates various officials who can make nominations for competitive appointments, including the Vice President, Senators, Members of the House of Representatives, Delegates, the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico, and the Commandant of the Coast Guard (for enlisted members). This formalizes the congressional role in the nomination process.

Section 2(a)(3), adding subsection (d) to Section 1922

Annual Allocation of Cadet Appointments

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This provision specifies how competitive appointment positions at the Coast Guard Academy will be allocated each year, starting in the 2029 academic year. It sets aside positions for children of deceased or disabled service members, a Vice Presidential nominee, 230 positions for state residents nominated by Members of Congress (proportional to representation), and specific allocations for Delegates from various territories and the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico. Additionally, 20 positions are reserved for enlisted members of the Coast Guard or Reserve nominated by the Commandant.

Section 2(a)(3), adding subsection (e) to Section 1922

Commencement of Congressional Nomination Process

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision mandates that starting in the 2029 academic year, the Secretary (in collaboration with the Commandant) must initiate the process for Members of Congress to nominate cadets for the subsequent academic year. This sets the effective date for the new system.

Section 2(a)(3), adding subsection (f) to Section 1922

Merit-Based Appointment System

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This provision requires the Secretary to establish a competitive system for selecting nominated individuals, considering competitive examinations, academic background, and other indicators of motivation and success. It specifies that appointments are made based on merit within each jurisdiction first, and then from remaining individuals across all jurisdictions if positions are unfilled.

Section 2(a)(3), adding subsection (g) to Section 1922

Notification and Transparency for Congressional Nominations

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision requires that a nominating Senator, Representative, or Delegate be notified at least 48 hours before an official announcement of their nominee's appointment. It also mandates that the Superintendent of the Coast Guard Academy furnish the name of the nominating authority for any appointed individual upon written request from a Member of Congress.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this