The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 5099·119th Congress·Introduced Jul 23, 2026

A bill to amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize a grant program for addressing dental workforce needs.

IntroducedHealthSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Booker, Cory A. [D-NJ]
Committees
Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee (primary)
Last action
Jul 23, 2026

Bottom line

This bill ensures the continuation and a slight increase in federal funding for programs designed to strengthen the nation's dental workforce over the next five fiscal years.

What it actually does

This bill reauthorizes a federal grant program under the Public Health Service Act aimed at addressing dental workforce needs. It amends Section 340G(f) to replace the previous funding authorization of $13,903,000 for fiscal years 2019 through 2023 with a new authorization of $15,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2027 through 2031, with funds remaining available until expended.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that reauthorizing this grant program is critical for maintaining and expanding access to essential oral healthcare services, particularly in underserved communities facing persistent dental workforce shortages. They contend that the modest increase in funding will help address rising costs and support vital initiatives for recruiting, training, and retaining dental professionals.

Opponents contend

Critics, if any, might argue that while the goal of strengthening the dental workforce is laudable, the proposed funding increase may be insufficient to make a significant impact on the scale of the problem. Some may also advocate for a more comprehensive evaluation of the program's effectiveness before reauthorization or argue for alternative approaches to addressing dental workforce needs.

The bill text is exceptionally brief and can be read and understood in less than one minute, making it highly accessible for any reader.

Section 1, Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 256g(f))

Reauthorization and Increased Funding for Dental Workforce Grants

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision updates the existing authorization for a grant program under the Public Health Service Act. It replaces the previous funding levels and dates, authorizing $15,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2027 through 2031. These funds are designated to remain available until expended, ensuring that the program can continue to provide grants to address dental workforce needs across the country.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupDental schools and training programsImpactReceive federal grants to support dental education and training initiatives.MechanismDirect funding through the reauthorized grant program.ScaleApproximately $15 million annually for five years.
GroupIndividuals and communities in dental health professional shortage areasImpactImproved access to dental care services.MechanismIncreased availability of dental professionals trained and retained through grant-funded programs.ScalePotentially widespread, depending on grant distribution and program success.
GroupDental students and professionalsImpactSupport for education, recruitment, and retention efforts.MechanismFunding for scholarships, loan repayment programs, and innovative training models.ScaleDirect benefit to those participating in or benefiting from grant-funded initiatives.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this reauthorization is vital for sustaining efforts to build a robust dental workforce, especially in areas struggling with access to care. They contend that the increased funding acknowledges the growing demand for dental services and the rising costs associated with training and retaining qualified professionals.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against the reauthorization of established public health grant programs that address critical workforce needs. However, some might argue that the increase is insufficient to address the full scope of the problem or that the program's impact should be more rigorously demonstrated.

Tradeoffs

The primary tradeoff involves the allocation of federal resources, balancing the need for dental workforce development against other public health priorities or fiscal constraints. There is also a tension between the immediate need for more dental professionals and the long-term investment required for effective training and retention programs.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this