The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 5247·119th Congress·Introduced Aug 5, 2026

Defense Community Infrastructure Program Tribal Eligibility Act of 2026

IntroducedNative AmericansSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Murray, Patty [D-WA]
Committees
Armed Services Committee (primary)
Last action
Aug 5, 2026

Bottom line

This bill expands eligibility for the Defense Community Infrastructure Program to include Indian Tribes, enabling them to receive federal grants for infrastructure projects that benefit military communities.

What it actually does

This bill amends title 10, United States Code, to explicitly include Indian Tribes as eligible entities for the Defense Community Infrastructure Program (DCIP). By modifying existing language in Section 2391, the bill allows Tribal governments to apply for federal grants to fund infrastructure projects that support military installations and their surrounding communities. It also formally defines 'Indian Tribe' by referencing the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill rectifies an oversight by ensuring that Indian Tribes, which often host or are adjacent to military installations, can access critical funding to improve infrastructure that directly supports military readiness and quality of life for service members and their families. It promotes equity, strengthens partnerships between the Department of Defense and Tribal governments, and acknowledges the unique governmental status of Tribes.

Opponents contend

Potential opponents might express concerns that expanding the pool of eligible entities without a corresponding increase in program funding could dilute the available resources for existing eligible entities (states and local governments), leading to increased competition for grants. However, direct opposition to the inclusion of Tribes in such a program is generally uncommon.

The bill is very short and clearly written, making its core purpose immediately accessible to any reader within a minute.

Section 2, amending Section 2391 of title 10, United States Code

Inclusion of Indian Tribes in Defense Community Infrastructure Program Eligibility

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision modifies existing federal law (10 U.S.C. 2391) to explicitly add "Indian Tribes" alongside state and local governments as eligible entities for the Defense Community Infrastructure Program (DCIP). This change allows Tribal governments to apply for grants under the program to fund infrastructure projects that support military installations and their personnel. The bill also clarifies that the term "Indian Tribe" will have the meaning defined in section 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5304), ensuring a consistent legal definition.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupIndian TribesImpactPositive, increased eligibility for federal grants to improve infrastructure supporting military installations.MechanismDirect amendment of 10 U.S.C. 2391 to include "Indian Tribes" in eligibility criteria.ScalePotentially significant for Tribes near military installations, enabling infrastructure development and strengthening community ties.
GroupDepartment of Defense (DoD)ImpactPositive, expanded partnerships and improved infrastructure supporting military missions and personnel quality of life.MechanismBroader pool of partners for infrastructure projects that benefit military bases.ScaleEnhanced community support for military bases and improved readiness.
GroupState and Local Governments (existing DCIP recipients)ImpactPotentially neutral to slightly negative, as the applicant pool expands, potentially increasing competition for a fixed amount of program funds.MechanismExpanded applicant pool for a potentially fixed funding amount.ScaleMinor, as the program is already competitive, but could slightly reduce individual applicant success rates if funding is not increased.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that including Indian Tribes in the DCIP is a matter of equity and practical necessity, recognizing their unique governmental status and their role as neighbors to many military installations. This ensures that infrastructure needs in Tribal communities that directly benefit military operations and personnel can be addressed through appropriate federal channels, fostering stronger intergovernmental relations and enhancing national security.

Critics contend

Critics, if any, might argue that expanding eligibility without a corresponding increase in program funding could lead to greater competition among applicants, potentially reducing the success rate for existing state and local government applicants. However, this is a general concern about program expansion rather than a specific objection to Tribal inclusion.

Tradeoffs

The primary tradeoff involves balancing the expansion of eligibility to a deserving group with the potential for increased competition for existing program funds. There's a tension between ensuring equitable access for all relevant governmental entities and maintaining the effectiveness of the program for its original beneficiaries, assuming a fixed budget.

FOUND

This provision defines the term "Indian Tribe" for the purposes of the Defense Community Infrastructure Program by referencing section 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5304).

Section 2(2)(B), adding new paragraph (7) to subsection (e) of 10 U.S.C. 2391

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice to ensure consistency and avoid redundant definitions, rather than an attempt to hide information or obscure the bill's intent.

Case for: Using an existing, well-established definition for "Indian Tribe" ensures legal consistency across federal programs and avoids creating new, potentially conflicting definitions, streamlining implementation.

Case against: Requires external lookup, which can slightly increase the effort for a reader to fully grasp the bill's exact scope without immediate context, though the reference is clearly provided.

Estimated impact: Ensures that the program's benefits are extended to federally recognized Indian Tribes as defined by existing law, which is a specific and identifiable group, thereby clarifying the intended beneficiaries.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this