The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 5276·119th Congress·Introduced Aug 6, 2026

Reducing Red Tape for Rebuilding Act

IntroducedEmergency ManagementSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Schiff, Adam B. [D-CA]
Committees
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee (primary)
Last action
Aug 6, 2026

Bottom line

This bill extends the timeframe for federal reimbursement of local government wage costs incurred during disaster recovery and building code enforcement, aiming to streamline post-disaster rebuilding efforts and reduce administrative burdens.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to extend the eligibility period for federal reimbursement of base and overtime wages for 'extra hires' involved in post-disaster activities. Specifically, it adjusts the period for substantial damage determinations to 180 days after a major disaster declaration and for building code enforcement activities to up to 2 years after a date selected by the recipient.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that this legislation is crucial for state and local governments, who often face significant staffing and financial challenges in the immediate aftermath of a disaster. Extending these eligibility periods provides necessary flexibility, ensuring that critical tasks like damage assessment and building code enforcement can be adequately staffed and completed without local jurisdictions incurring unrecoverable costs or rushing essential work, ultimately leading to more resilient recovery.

Opponents contend

Opponents might raise concerns that extending these eligibility periods could lead to increased federal spending over longer durations and potentially reduce the urgency for local governments to complete recovery tasks efficiently. They may argue that while support is necessary, prolonged federal involvement could foster dependency or lead to less fiscal discipline at the local level.

The bill is exceptionally short and clear, allowing for a complete understanding in a fraction of the time typically available for legislative review.

Section 2

Extension of Wage Eligibility for Disaster Recovery Activities

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends Section 406(a)(2)(D) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act. It extends the period during which base and overtime wages for 'extra hires' are eligible for federal reimbursement after a major disaster. For 'substantial damage determinations,' the period is adjusted to 180 days after the disaster declaration. For 'all other activities to facilitate the implementation and enforcement of adopted building codes,' the period is extended to 'not more than 2 years after a date selected by the recipient.' This change provides state and local governments with more time to claim federal funds for these critical post-disaster staffing costs.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupState and local governmentsImpactIncreased financial flexibility and reduced administrative burden for post-disaster recovery and rebuilding efforts.MechanismExtended eligibility for federal reimbursement of wage costs for specific disaster-related personnel.ScalePotentially significant for jurisdictions frequently impacted by major disasters, alleviating immediate financial strain.
GroupDisaster-affected communitiesImpactPotentially faster, more thorough, and more resilient rebuilding due to enhanced local capacity for damage assessment and code enforcement.MechanismImproved local government financial stability and operational capacity to manage recovery, leading to better outcomes for residents.ScaleVaries by disaster severity and the capacity of the local government to utilize the extended period effectively.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this extension is crucial for state and local governments, who often face significant staffing and financial challenges in the immediate aftermath of a disaster. It ensures they can hire necessary personnel for critical tasks like damage assessment and building code enforcement without fear of losing federal reimbursement due to arbitrary time limits, thus promoting more effective and resilient recovery.

Critics contend

Critics might contend that extending these eligibility periods could lead to less urgency in completing tasks, potentially increasing overall costs to the federal government. They might argue that existing timeframes, while sometimes challenging, encourage efficiency and prevent prolonged reliance on federal funds for what should be primarily local responsibilities.

Tradeoffs

The bill navigates the tension between providing necessary flexibility and financial support to local governments during disaster recovery and ensuring federal fiscal responsibility. It aims to alleviate pressure on local entities while potentially increasing federal outlay over a longer period, balancing immediate needs with long-term cost considerations.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this