The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 5325·119th Congress·Introduced Aug 6, 2026

Delaney Hall Closure Act

IntroducedImmigrationSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Booker, Cory A. [D-NJ]
Committees
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee (primary)
Last action
Aug 6, 2026

Bottom line

The bill requires the immediate closure of the Delaney Hall immigration detention center and prevents its future use for immigration detention.

What it actually does

This bill mandates the Secretary of Homeland Security to halt all immigration detention activities at the Delaney Hall Detention Center in Newark, New Jersey, within 90 days of the bill's enactment. It also prohibits the Secretary from entering into any future contracts or agreements to use Delaney Hall for detaining aliens. Furthermore, the bill requires the termination of any existing contract for the facility's operation, limiting the government's liability to services rendered before the termination date.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that closing Delaney Hall is a necessary step to address concerns regarding the conditions and operational practices at the facility, aligning with efforts to reform the immigration detention system. They contend that it promotes a more humane approach to immigration enforcement and encourages the exploration of alternatives to detention, which can be more cost-effective and community-integrated.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that closing Delaney Hall would reduce critical detention capacity, potentially leading to overcrowding at other facilities or the release of individuals who pose a flight risk or public safety concern. They may also raise concerns about the financial implications of terminating existing contracts and the logistical challenges of relocating detainees and staff, potentially increasing overall costs for the Department of Homeland Security.

The bill text is very short and clear, making it highly accessible for a reader to understand its core provisions quickly.

Section 3(a)(1)

Cessation of Immigration Detention Operations

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to stop all immigration detention operations at the Delaney Hall Detention Center in Newark, New Jersey. This action must be completed within 90 days after the date the bill becomes law. It directly targets the immediate cessation of the facility's current function as an immigration detention center.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupImmigration detaineesImpactRelocation or releaseMechanismClosure of facilityScaleDirectly impacts all individuals currently detained at Delaney Hall
GroupDepartment of Homeland Security (DHS)ImpactOperational change and resource reallocationMechanismMandated closureScaleRequires logistical planning for transfers and potential new detention arrangements

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this immediate cessation is crucial for addressing documented issues at Delaney Hall, ensuring more humane treatment for detainees, and signaling a commitment to reducing reliance on detention facilities with problematic histories.

Critics contend

Critics may contend that a rapid 90-day timeline for cessation could create logistical challenges for DHS, potentially leading to rushed transfers, increased costs, or temporary capacity shortages in the immigration detention system.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the urgency of addressing concerns at Delaney Hall with the operational challenges and potential costs associated with rapidly ceasing detention operations and relocating detainees.

Section 3(a)(2)

Prohibition on Future Detention Contracts

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision explicitly forbids the Secretary of Homeland Security from entering into any new contracts or agreements to operate the Delaney Hall Detention Center as a facility for detaining aliens. This ensures that once the facility ceases its current operations, it cannot be repurposed for the same function in the future under DHS custody.

Section 3(b)

Termination of Existing Contracts for Convenience

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section mandates the Secretary to terminate any existing contract for the operation of the Delaney Hall Detention Center, citing the 'Government's interest.' It also specifies that the Department's liability for such termination will be limited to payment for services that were rendered before the effective date of the contract termination. This ensures a clean break from current contractual obligations while limiting financial exposure.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this