The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 5332·119th Congress·Introduced Aug 6, 2026

Cooperative Institute Act of 2026

IntroducedPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Cantwell, Maria [D-WA]
Committees
Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee (primary)
Last action
Aug 6, 2026

Bottom line

The bill codifies and formalizes NOAA's Cooperative Institute program, ensuring its continuity and establishing clear operational and oversight guidelines.

What it actually does

This bill, the "Cooperative Institute Act of 2026," directs the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to formally maintain its Cooperative Institute program. It establishes program goals, outlines activities for these institutes, and sets procedures for their establishment, financial assistance, and potential discontinuance. The bill also mandates the maintenance of existing Cooperative Institutes unless specific termination criteria are met.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that formalizing the Cooperative Institute program provides stability and a clear legal framework for NOAA's critical partnerships with academic and research institutions. This ensures continued access to external scientific expertise, fosters innovation, and supports the next generation of scientists through student involvement, which is vital for addressing complex oceanic and atmospheric challenges.

Opponents contend

Critics might contend that while the program itself is valuable, codifying it in this manner could reduce flexibility for NOAA to adapt its research partnerships to evolving needs without legislative amendment. Some may also argue that mandating the maintenance of existing institutes could hinder the agency's ability to reallocate resources to new priorities or more effective partnerships in the future, potentially locking in less efficient arrangements.

The bill is concise and well-structured, allowing an informed reader to grasp its core provisions and implications within the given time.

Section 2(b) and 2(g)

Formalizing and Maintaining the Cooperative Institute Program

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision directs the Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere to maintain a Cooperative Institute program within NOAA. It defines the program's goals, which include promoting basic and applied research, education, training, and outreach aligned with NOAA's mission, funding external research capabilities, and expanding research capacity. Crucially, it explicitly mandates the maintenance of Cooperative Institutes existing as of the bill's enactment date, unless they are formally terminated.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)ImpactMandates the continuation and formalization of a key research partnership program.MechanismLegislative directive to maintain the program and its existing institutes.ScaleAgency-wide, affecting research strategy and resource allocation.
GroupEligible research institutions (academic and nonprofit)ImpactEnsures continued opportunities for collaborative research and funding through NOAA partnerships.MechanismGuaranteed program existence and explicit directive to maintain current institutes.ScaleSignificant for institutions with existing or potential NOAA partnerships.
GroupStudents and postdoctoral scientistsImpactSupports involvement in NOAA-related research and education.MechanismProgram goals explicitly include supporting student participation.ScaleBeneficial for career development and scientific training.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that codifying the program provides essential stability and clarity for NOAA's long-term research strategy. By explicitly maintaining existing institutes, it preserves valuable scientific infrastructure and expertise, ensuring continuity in critical environmental research and education.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that mandating the maintenance of existing institutes could limit NOAA's flexibility to adapt to changing scientific priorities or to discontinue less effective partnerships without a formal, potentially cumbersome, termination process. This could lead to inertia in program evolution.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the desire for program stability and continuity with the need for flexibility and adaptability in scientific research. While it ensures ongoing support for established partnerships, it also introduces a formal process for discontinuance, which could be seen as either a necessary safeguard or an administrative burden.

Section 2(c)

Establishment and Operational Guidelines for Cooperative Institutes

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This section outlines the process for establishing new Cooperative Institutes, requiring an open competition and merit-based peer-review process, though it allows for a limited competition if determined to be in the Federal Government's best interest. It encourages consolidation of management activities when multiple institutions form an institute and authorizes the collocation of Federal and Cooperative Institute staff to foster collaboration, choosing arrangements that best fit the needs and benefits.

Section 2(d) and 2(e)

Financial Assistance, Renewal, and Discontinuance Procedures

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This provision details the financial structure, allowing for 5-year Federal financial assistance awards. It establishes a renewal process based on an externally led peer review conducted by the Science Advisory Board, measuring performance against agreed-upon metrics, which can lead to a second 5-year award. It also outlines a formal discontinuance process, requiring a 60-day notice to Congress with a detailed report justifying termination or non-renewal, including reasons for failure, performance measurements, and plans for reassignment of staff and fulfillment of research needs.

FOUND

This provision allows the Under Secretary to use a 'limited competition' for selecting new Cooperative Institutes when it is determined to be in the 'best interest of the Federal Government,' requiring justification under Department of Commerce and Administration policies.

Section 2(c)(2)(B)

Why it matters:While not necessarily evasive, such exceptions to open competition are often placed within the details of procedural sections. It's standard legislative practice to provide agencies with some discretion, but the conditions for exercising that discretion are important to note.

Case for: Supporters argue this flexibility is necessary for NOAA to address highly specialized or urgent research needs where only a limited number of institutions possess the unique capabilities required. It allows for efficient targeting of expertise without a lengthy open competition process.

Case against: Critics might argue that this provision could be used to circumvent the spirit of open competition, potentially leading to less transparent selection processes or favoring institutions based on non-merit factors. The broad phrasing 'best interest of the Federal Government' could be open to varied interpretations.

Estimated impact: Potentially impacts the fairness and openness of the selection process for a subset of new Cooperative Institutes, affecting which institutions receive federal funding and research opportunities.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this