The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 5474·119th Congress·Introduced Sep 23, 2026

Safe Access to the Polls Act

IntroducedGovernment Operations and PoliticsSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Baldwin, Tammy [D-WI]
Committees
Rules and Administration Committee (primary)
Last action
Sep 23, 2026

Bottom line

The Safe Access to the Polls Act seeks to safeguard voter access and prevent intimidation by prohibiting federal law enforcement and military personnel from being present near or interfering with access to polling locations.

What it actually does

This bill prohibits the expenditure of federal funds to deploy agents or officers of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), or uniformed members of the National Guard, within a quarter-mile of any polling location during a voting period. It also bans setting up checkpoints along routes to polling places or interfering with an eligible voter's access to vote. The aim is to prevent perceived intimidation at election sites.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill protects the integrity of the electoral process by preventing potential voter intimidation and ensuring all eligible voters feel safe and unhindered when casting their ballots. They contend that the visible presence of armed federal agents or uniformed military personnel near polling places can deter voters, particularly minority groups or those with immigration concerns, from exercising their constitutional right to vote.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that this bill could restrict the ability of federal authorities to maintain public order or respond to security threats near polling places, potentially compromising safety or election security in certain circumstances. They might contend that such prohibitions are overly broad and could hinder legitimate law enforcement or emergency response efforts.

The bill is exceptionally short and clearly written, allowing for a quick and complete understanding of its provisions in less than two minutes.

Section 2

Prohibition on Federal Funds for DHS or National Guard Presence Near Election Locations

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section explicitly forbids the use of any federal money to send agents from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), or uniformed National Guard members, to areas near polling places during an election. Specifically, they cannot be deployed within a quarter-mile of a polling location, set up checkpoints on any route to such a location, or otherwise obstruct any eligible voter's ability to access their assigned voting site.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupEligible votersImpactIncreased sense of security and reduced intimidation at polling placesMechanismRemoval of visible federal law enforcement/military presenceScaleNationwide during all voting periods
GroupU.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)ImpactRestricted operational scope near polling placesMechanismProhibition on federal funding for specific deploymentsScaleLimited to election-related deployments
GroupNational GuardImpactRestricted operational scope near polling placesMechanismProhibition on federal funding for specific deploymentsScaleLimited to election-related deployments

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this provision is crucial for protecting democratic participation, as the visible presence of federal law enforcement or military personnel can create an intimidating atmosphere, particularly for immigrant communities or minority voters, discouraging them from exercising their right to vote. They assert it upholds the principle of civilian control over elections.

Critics contend

Critics might contend that this provision could hinder legitimate security operations or emergency responses by federal agencies or the National Guard, potentially leaving polling places vulnerable to disruption or threats. They may argue that it unnecessarily restricts the ability of authorities to ensure safety and order.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances the desire to protect voter access and prevent intimidation against potential concerns about maintaining security and order at polling places, particularly in scenarios where a genuine threat might arise or where law enforcement presence is deemed necessary for public safety.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this