No Chinese Seafood in Congress Act
- Sponsor
- Sen. Sullivan, Dan [R-AK]
- Committees
- Rules and Administration Committee (primary)
- Last action
- Sep 23, 2026
Bottom line
The bill aims to eliminate all seafood products with any connection to China from food service operations within the U.S. Capitol complex.
What it actually does
This bill prohibits any seafood product that is fished, harvested, raised, produced, or processed, in whole or in part, in the People's Republic of China (including Hong Kong and Macau), or by Chinese-owned or flagged vessels, from being procured for, served in, or sold in any congressional dining facility. It mandates relevant congressional entities to prescribe regulations to enforce this prohibition within 180 days of enactment.
Proponents argue
Supporters argue that this bill is a necessary step to reduce reliance on a geopolitical rival, ensure that U.S. government facilities do not inadvertently support industries potentially linked to unfair labor practices or environmental degradation in China, and to symbolically bolster support for American seafood industries and national security.
Opponents contend
Critics might contend that this bill is largely symbolic, having a negligible economic impact on China while potentially increasing operational costs for congressional dining facilities and limiting food choices for staff and visitors. Some may view it as an overly broad measure for a limited scope.
The bill is very short and clear, making it highly accessible for a quick and informed evaluation.
Section 2
Prohibition of Chinese Seafood Products in Congressional Dining Facilities
This section establishes a comprehensive ban on 'covered Chinese seafood products' within any cafeteria, restaurant, or food service facility located in the Capitol Buildings or on the United States Capitol Grounds. A 'covered Chinese seafood product' is broadly defined as any seafood for human consumption that is sourced (fished, harvested, raised, produced, or processed) in China (including Hong Kong and Macau) or by vessels owned, operated, registered, or flagged by China. The bill requires relevant congressional entities, such as the Committee on House Administration and the Architect of the Capitol, to issue regulations to implement this prohibition within 180 days.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that this provision directly addresses concerns about supporting China's economy, particularly given geopolitical tensions and potential issues with Chinese labor practices or environmental regulations in their seafood industry. It promotes food security and supports domestic industries by shifting procurement away from Chinese sources.
Critics contend
Critics might argue that this provision is largely symbolic, having a negligible impact on China's economy while potentially increasing operational costs for congressional dining facilities and limiting consumer choice. They may also view it as an overreach for a relatively minor issue.
Tradeoffs
The bill balances the symbolic and potential national security benefits of reducing reliance on Chinese products against the practical considerations of increased operational costs and potential limitations on food choices within congressional dining facilities.