The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 5522·119th Congress·Introduced Sep 24, 2026

Protecting Biological Data as Critical Infrastructure Act

IntroducedArmed Forces and National SecurityMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Young, Todd [R-IN]
Committees
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee (primary)
Last action
Sep 24, 2026

Bottom line

The bill expands CISA's mandate to include the cybersecurity of genetic and sensitive biometric data, recognizing biological data systems as critical infrastructure and fostering collaboration with the biotechnology sector.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to explicitly mandate the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) to protect genetic data systems and other sensitive biometric data. It directs CISA to oversee security management, provide training, and take necessary actions to protect biological data and critical biotechnology infrastructure, formally treating these as critical infrastructure.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that this bill is crucial for national security, as genetic and biometric data are increasingly valuable targets for foreign adversaries and cybercriminals. By designating these systems as critical infrastructure and empowering CISA, the bill proactively protects sensitive biological information, safeguards the biotechnology sector, and ensures the integrity of the nation's biological data against emerging threats.

Opponents contend

Opponents might express concerns about potential overreach of federal authority into the private biotechnology sector, arguing that existing cybersecurity frameworks or industry-led initiatives might be sufficient. They could also raise questions about the cost implications for CISA and the private sector, or potential impacts on innovation if regulations become too burdensome.

The bill is very short and can be read quickly, allowing ample time for detailed consideration of its implications.

Section 2(1)(A)(iii), inserting new paragraphs (14), (15), (16) into 6 U.S.C. 652(c)

Expanding CISA's Duties to Include Genetic Data System Security Management

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision adds three new responsibilities to CISA's core duties. It requires CISA to oversee the planning, management, and coordination of security for genetic data systems and other sensitive biometric data, ensuring adequate staffing. It also mandates CISA to provide training for federal personnel on protecting these systems, including unique security and ethical challenges. Finally, it requires CISA to take necessary actions to protect biological data and critical biotechnology infrastructure.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupCISA staffImpactIncreased duties and responsibilities, potential for new hiring and specialized training.MechanismNew statutory mandates for oversight, training, and protection.ScaleSignificant expansion of CISA's operational scope.
GroupFederal personnelImpactReceive specialized training on protecting genetic and biometric data systems.MechanismCISA is required to provide training.ScaleBroad impact on federal agencies handling such data.
GroupBiotechnology sectorImpactSubject to CISA oversight and protection efforts, potentially benefiting from enhanced security.MechanismCISA's mandate to protect biological data and critical biotechnology infrastructure.ScaleSector-wide impact on security posture.
GroupIndividuals with genetic/biometric dataImpactIncreased protection of their sensitive personal information.MechanismEnhanced federal efforts to secure genetic data systems.ScaleBroad societal benefit from improved data security.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue these new duties are essential to address the growing cyber threats to sensitive biological data, ensuring CISA has the explicit mandate and resources to protect a vital national asset, thereby safeguarding public health and national security.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that CISA's existing broad authority already covers critical infrastructure, and this explicit expansion could lead to duplication of efforts or an over-specialization that strains resources without clear added benefit, potentially creating bureaucratic inefficiencies.

Tradeoffs

Balancing the need for robust federal oversight and protection of sensitive data with potential concerns about bureaucratic expansion or overlapping agency responsibilities, and ensuring efficient resource allocation.

Section 2(1)(B), adding new subparagraphs (S), (T), (U) to 6 U.S.C. 652(e)(1)

Designating Genetic Data Systems as Critical Infrastructure and Mandating Stakeholder Consultation

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision explicitly directs CISA to treat genetic data systems, including genomic sequences and other sensitive biometric data, as critical infrastructure. It also requires CISA to consult with U.S. biotechnology sector stakeholders to develop security protocols for these systems and to collaborate with these stakeholders and others engaged in biosecurity policy. This collaboration includes facilitating engagements and providing a secure line of communication for reporting incidents and requesting technical assistance.

Section 2(2), adding new subparagraph (E) to 6 U.S.C. 661(b)(2)

Including Genetic and Biometric Data Security in CISA's Strategic Plan

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision adds 'Genetic and biometric data security' as a specific element that CISA must include in its strategic plan. This ensures that CISA's long-term planning and resource allocation explicitly address this area of cybersecurity, integrating it into the agency's foundational strategy.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this