The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 5609·119th Congress·Introduced Sep 30, 2026

HCBS Anti-Fraud Reporting Act of 2026

IntroducedHealthSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Moody, Ashley [R-FL]
Committees
Finance Committee (primary)
Last action
Sep 30, 2026

Bottom line

This bill requires states to submit annual reports to the federal government detailing anti-fraud measures and detected fraud within their Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services programs.

What it actually does

This bill amends Section 1915(c)(2) of the Social Security Act to mandate that states annually report to the Secretary of Health and Human Services on waste, fraud, or abuse detected within their Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) waivers. The reports must also detail the efforts undertaken by states to prevent such issues. This new reporting requirement will apply starting from the year 2026.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this legislation is a crucial step towards enhancing transparency and accountability within the Medicaid HCBS program, which represents a significant federal and state expenditure. By requiring states to report on their anti-fraud activities and findings, the bill provides the federal government with essential data to identify vulnerabilities, share best practices, and ensure that taxpayer funds are used effectively to deliver services to eligible beneficiaries.

Opponents contend

Opponents might contend that while the objective of combating fraud is important, this bill imposes an additional administrative burden on states. They could argue that states already have incentives and existing mechanisms to detect and prevent fraud, and that new, potentially unfunded, reporting mandates could divert resources from direct service provision or more impactful fraud prevention activities, rather than genuinely improving program integrity.

The bill is exceptionally concise and clearly written, allowing any informed reader to quickly grasp its provisions and implications.

Section 2, amending Section 1915(c)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396n(c)(2))

State Reporting on HCBS Anti-Fraud Measures

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision mandates that, beginning in 2026 and for every subsequent year, each state must submit a report to the Secretary of Health and Human Services. These reports are required to detail any instances of waste, fraud, or abuse that the state has detected in connection with services provided under its Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) waiver. Additionally, the reports must outline the specific actions and efforts the state has implemented to prevent such waste, fraud, and abuse from occurring within its HCBS program.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupState Medicaid agenciesImpactIncreased administrative burden and new reporting requirementsMechanismFederal mandate for annual data collection and submission on fraud detection and prevention efforts.ScaleApplies to all states operating Medicaid HCBS waivers.
GroupFederal government (Secretary of Health and Human Services)ImpactEnhanced oversight capacity and access to more granular data on state-level fraud preventionMechanismReceipt and review of standardized annual reports from states.ScaleNational scope for Medicaid HCBS program oversight.
GroupMedicaid HCBS beneficiariesImpactPotential for improved program integrity, leading to more stable and efficient service deliveryMechanismReduced fraud could free up resources for direct services and improve program quality.ScaleIndirect benefit to all individuals receiving HCBS through Medicaid.
GroupTaxpayers (federal and state)ImpactPotential for reduced waste and misuse of public fundsMechanismEnhanced fraud detection and prevention efforts could lead to cost savings.ScaleNational impact on federal and state budgets.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this reporting requirement is crucial for safeguarding the financial integrity of the Medicaid HCBS program. By compelling states to document their anti-fraud activities and detected issues, the federal government can gain a clearer picture of where vulnerabilities exist, identify effective prevention strategies, and ultimately ensure that public funds are directed towards legitimate care for beneficiaries.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that while the intent to combat fraud is commendable, this specific provision adds an unneeded layer of bureaucracy. They may contend that states already have strong incentives and existing mechanisms to address fraud, and that this new federal mandate could impose significant administrative costs and divert resources that could otherwise be used for direct fraud investigation or service delivery, without necessarily yielding substantial new insights.

Tradeoffs

This provision navigates the tension between the federal government's desire for greater accountability and oversight in a large federal-state program, and states' concerns about increased administrative burdens. It aims to improve transparency and reduce fraud, but its effectiveness will depend on the clarity of federal guidance, the quality of state reporting, and the federal government's capacity to analyze and act upon the collected data.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this