The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 5660·119th Congress·Introduced Sep 30, 2026

SUCCESS Act of 2026

IntroducedEducationSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Kaine, Tim [D-VA]
Committees
Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee (primary)
Last action
Sep 30, 2026

Bottom line

The SUCCESS Act of 2026 aims to improve academic outcomes and retention for student survivors of sexual assault and other violence by funding specialized, trauma-informed academic and mental health support services at colleges and universities.

What it actually does

This bill establishes a new competitive grant program, administered by the Secretary of Education, for institutions of higher education. The grants are intended to fund the implementation of patient-centered academic counseling and other support services specifically for student survivors of sexual assault and other violence. The bill defines what 'patient-centered' means in this context and outlines specific priorities for grant awards, including institutions with Title IX violations, community colleges, and minority-serving institutions.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that sexual assault significantly impacts student survivors' academic performance, leading to lower grade point averages, difficulty with self-regulated learning, and higher dropout rates due to associated trauma and mental health challenges. This bill provides crucial, targeted academic and mental health support, which is essential for improving retention and ensuring the educational success of a vulnerable student population that often lacks specialized academic accommodations.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that while the goal of supporting student survivors is laudable, establishing a new federal grant program adds to government spending and bureaucracy. They may contend that institutions should already be providing these essential services or that existing federal funding mechanisms could be leveraged more effectively to support survivors without creating new legislation and a new competitive grant process.

The bill is concise and clearly written, making it accessible for a quick but thorough review by an informed reader.

Sec. 3, Part BB, Sec. 898A(b)

Establishment of Competitive Grant Program

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section authorizes the Secretary of Education to award competitive grants to eligible institutions of higher education. The grants are specifically for implementing patient-centered academic counseling and other support services for student survivors of sexual assault and other violence. Each grant awarded under this program will have a term of 5 years.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupStudent survivors of sexual assault and other violenceImpactDirect beneficiaries of enhanced academic and support services.MechanismAccess to specialized counseling and accommodations funded by grants.ScaleIndividual students at participating institutions.
GroupInstitutions of higher educationImpactRecipients of federal funding to develop and implement new support programs.MechanismCompetitive grants to establish or expand services.ScaleParticipating colleges and universities nationwide.

Supporters argue

Establishing a dedicated grant program ensures that institutions have the necessary resources to develop and implement specialized, trauma-informed support systems that are currently lacking, directly addressing the academic challenges faced by survivors.

Critics contend

Some might argue that a new grant program creates an additional layer of bureaucracy and that institutions should be able to fund these services through existing budgets or other federal programs, rather than relying on new, competitive grants.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances the critical need for specialized support for student survivors with concerns about the expansion of federal funding mechanisms and potential administrative burdens on institutions.

Sec. 3, Part BB, Sec. 898A(a)(2)

Definition of 'Patient-Centered' Services

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision defines what 'patient-centered' means when referring to services for student survivors of sexual assault or other violence. It specifies that such services must recognize the widespread impact of trauma, identify signs and symptoms of trauma, integrate trauma knowledge into policies and practices, and actively avoid re-traumatizing individuals by creating supportive environments.

Sec. 3, Part BB, Sec. 898A(d)

Priority for Grant Awards

prominently featuredstraightforward

When awarding grants under this program, the Secretary of Education is directed to give priority to specific types of institutions. These include institutions of higher education with a history of violations of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, community colleges, and minority-serving institutions (such as Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Tribal Colleges and Universities).

Sec. 3, Part BB, Sec. 898A(e)

Permissible Uses of Grant Funds

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section specifies six ways in which eligible institutions receiving grants must use the funds. These include providing higher education re-entry assistance for student survivors, increasing training for faculty and administrators on patient-centered care and trauma recognition, offering professional development for academic advisors, providing academic accommodations (such as confidential tutoring), increasing mental health services, and creating or enhancing a fund for wrap-around services for survivors.

FOUND

This section defines 'sexual assault' by referencing an existing federal statute, section 485(f)(6)(A) of the Higher Education Act of 1965.

Sec. 3, Part BB, Sec. 898A(a)(3)

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice to ensure legal consistency and avoid reprinting lengthy definitions, thereby maintaining coherence with existing federal definitions of sexual assault.

Case for: Using an established definition ensures legal consistency and clarity, aligning the bill's scope with existing federal frameworks for addressing sexual assault.

Case against: Requires an additional step for the reader to fully understand the precise legal scope of 'sexual assault' as it applies to the bill, potentially hindering immediate comprehension.

Estimated impact: Ensures the bill's coverage of sexual assault aligns with existing federal definitions, impacting which incidents and survivors are eligible for services under the grant program.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this