The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 895·119th Congress·Introduced Mar 6, 2025

DELIVER Act of 2025

IntroducedTaxationSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. King, Angus S., Jr. [I-ME]
Committees
Finance Committee (primary)
Last action
Mar 6, 2025

Bottom line

The DELIVER Act of 2025 aims to incentivize meal delivery volunteerism by increasing the tax-deductible mileage rate for volunteers to match the higher business rate, thereby reducing their out-of-pocket expenses.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow volunteers who use their personal automobiles to deliver meals to homebound elderly, disabled, frail, or at-risk individuals to deduct mileage at the standard business mileage rate. Currently, charitable mileage is deductible at a lower rate than business mileage. The change would apply to miles driven on or after the date of enactment.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill will encourage more individuals to volunteer for essential meal delivery services by helping to offset the rising costs of fuel and vehicle maintenance. They contend that it acknowledges the valuable contribution of these volunteers to vulnerable populations and ensures they are not financially penalized for their charitable efforts, ultimately strengthening community support networks.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that while well-intentioned, this measure represents a targeted tax expenditure that reduces federal revenue. They may also contend that the impact on overall volunteer engagement might be modest, as many factors beyond mileage reimbursement influence an individual's decision to volunteer, and the benefit primarily accrues to those who itemize deductions.

The bill is exceptionally short and clear, making it very accessible for any reader to understand its provisions and implications quickly.

Section 2(a)

Increase Standard Mileage Rate for Charitable Meal Delivery

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends Section 170(i) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. It specifies that for the use of an automobile in delivering meals to homebound individuals who are elderly, disabled, frail, or at risk, the deductible mileage rate for tax purposes shall be the standard business mileage rate set by the Internal Revenue Service for that taxable year. This is a higher rate than the current standard charitable mileage rate, allowing volunteers to deduct more for their driving expenses.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupVolunteers delivering meals to homebound individualsImpactPositiveMechanismIncreased tax deductions for mileage, reducing out-of-pocket costs.ScaleIndividual volunteers who itemize deductions
GroupCharitable organizations providing meal delivery servicesImpactPositiveMechanismPotentially easier recruitment and retention of volunteers due to reduced financial burden.ScaleOrganizational operations and service capacity
GroupElderly, disabled, frail, or at-risk homebound individualsImpactIndirectly positiveMechanismImproved reliability and sustainability of meal delivery services.ScaleBeneficiaries of meal delivery programs
GroupFederal government (Treasury/IRS)ImpactNegativeMechanismReduced tax revenue due to increased deductions claimed by volunteers.ScaleFederal budget

Supporters argue

Proponents argue that this specific provision directly supports a critical community service by making it more financially feasible for volunteers. They contend that it is a fair adjustment to reflect the actual costs of driving and will help sustain and expand vital meal delivery programs for vulnerable populations.

Critics contend

Opponents might argue that this provision, while supporting a worthy cause, constitutes a specific tax carve-out that could lead to calls for similar adjustments for other forms of charitable driving, potentially expanding the impact on federal revenue. They may also point out that the benefit primarily accrues to those who itemize deductions, which may not include all volunteers.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the desire to support and incentivize charitable volunteerism for a specific, vulnerable population against the cost of reduced federal tax revenue. There's also a tension regarding equity, as only volunteers who itemize deductions will directly benefit from the increased rate.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this