A joint resolution terminating the national emergency declared with respect to energy.
- Sponsor
- Sen. Kaine, Tim [D-VA]
- Committees
- Energy and Natural Resources Committee (primary)
- Last action
- Feb 26, 2025
Bottom line
This resolution seeks to end a recently declared national emergency related to energy, thereby curtailing the President's emergency powers in that domain.
What it actually does
This joint resolution terminates the national emergency concerning energy that was declared by the President on January 20, 2025, through Executive Order 14156. By doing so, it would revoke any special authorities or powers that the President might have exercised under the National Emergencies Act in relation to that specific energy emergency.
Proponents argue
Proponents argue that the national emergency declared with respect to energy is either unwarranted, has served its purpose, or grants the executive branch excessive powers that are not justified by current circumstances. They may contend that terminating it restores legislative oversight and prevents potential abuses of emergency authority, ensuring that normal legislative processes govern energy policy.
Opponents contend
Opponents would likely argue that the national emergency regarding energy is still necessary to address ongoing or potential crises, such as supply chain disruptions, price volatility, or national security concerns related to energy resources. They might assert that terminating the emergency prematurely could destabilize energy markets, hinder the government's ability to respond effectively to future challenges, or undermine critical national interests.
The bill text is extremely short and straightforward, allowing for immediate comprehension of its direct action.
Section 1
Termination of National Energy Emergency
This provision explicitly states that the national emergency concerning energy, which was declared by the President on January 20, 2025, via Executive Order 14156, is hereby ended. This action would revoke any special authorities or powers that were activated under the National Emergencies Act specifically for this energy emergency, returning the situation to pre-emergency legal frameworks.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that ending the emergency ensures that government actions related to energy are subject to normal legislative and regulatory processes, preventing overreach and promoting transparency. They contend that the emergency powers are no longer justified or were never truly necessary.
Critics contend
Opponents would argue that maintaining the emergency declaration is crucial for the President to respond swiftly and effectively to ongoing or unforeseen challenges in the energy sector, such as supply chain disruptions or geopolitical events impacting energy security. They might claim that terminating it could leave the nation vulnerable.
Tradeoffs
The resolution balances the desire for executive flexibility and rapid response during perceived crises against the principle of limiting executive power and ensuring legislative oversight in matters of national policy.