The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S.J.Res. 203·119th Congress·Introduced Jul 29, 2026

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency relating to "Preemption Determination: State Interest-on-Escrow Laws".

IntroducedFinance and Financial SectorSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Reed, Jack [D-RI]
Committees
Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee (primary)
Last action
Jul 29, 2026

Bottom line

This resolution aims to block a federal banking regulator's rule concerning the preemption of state laws that mandate interest payments on mortgage escrow accounts.

What it actually does

This joint resolution, introduced under the Congressional Review Act (CRA), seeks to nullify a final rule issued by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). The OCC rule in question pertains to "Preemption Determination: State Interest-on-Escrow Laws," which likely clarifies or expands the circumstances under which federal law preempts state laws requiring interest payments on mortgage escrow accounts. By disapproving this rule, the resolution would prevent it from taking effect, thereby maintaining the status quo regarding the OCC's stance on state interest-on-escrow laws.

Proponents argue

Proponents of this resolution argue that the OCC's rule oversteps federal authority by preempting state laws designed to protect consumers. They contend that state interest-on-escrow laws ensure homeowners receive a return on funds held in escrow for taxes and insurance, and that the OCC's rule undermines these consumer protections, potentially allowing banks to profit from these funds without compensating homeowners. They believe states should retain the power to regulate these aspects of banking to better serve their residents.

Opponents contend

Opponents of this resolution (and thus proponents of the OCC rule) would argue that the OCC's rule provides necessary regulatory clarity and uniformity for national banks, preventing a patchwork of differing state laws that can complicate compliance and increase operational costs. They might assert that federal preemption is essential for the efficient functioning of the national banking system and that state-mandated interest on escrow accounts can impose undue burdens on banks, potentially leading to higher costs for consumers in other areas or reduced availability of certain financial products.

The bill text is extremely short and straightforward, allowing for immediate comprehension of its direct action.

Section 1

Congressional Disapproval of OCC Rule

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision explicitly states that Congress disapproves of the rule submitted by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) titled "Preemption Determination: State Interest-on-Escrow Laws," which was published in the Federal Register on May 19, 2026 (91 Fed. Reg. 29350). By disapproving the rule, the resolution dictates that the OCC's rule will not take effect and will have no legal standing. This effectively prevents the OCC from implementing its policy regarding the preemption of state laws concerning interest on mortgage escrow accounts.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupHomeowners with mortgage escrow accountsImpactPotential for receiving interest on escrow fundsMechanismIf the resolution passes, state laws requiring interest on escrow accounts would not be preempted by this specific OCC rule, potentially preserving or expanding homeowners' ability to earn interest on these funds.ScaleMillions of homeowners nationwide, particularly in states with such laws.
GroupNational banks and federal savings associationsImpactRegulatory compliance burden and operational costsMechanismIf the resolution passes, banks would continue to be subject to state interest-on-escrow laws where applicable, potentially increasing their compliance costs and administrative burden compared to if the OCC rule had taken effect.ScaleAll federally chartered banks operating in states with interest-on-escrow laws.
GroupState banking regulators and legislaturesImpactPreservation of state regulatory authorityMechanismThe resolution upholds states' ability to enact and enforce laws requiring interest on escrow accounts without federal preemption by this specific OCC rule.ScaleRelevant state governmental bodies.

Supporters argue

Supporters of this provision argue that it is crucial for protecting consumer interests by ensuring that state laws requiring interest on mortgage escrow accounts remain effective. They contend that allowing the OCC rule to stand would undermine states' rights to regulate financial services for their residents and could lead to banks holding escrow funds without compensating homeowners for their use.

Critics contend

Opponents of this provision (and supporters of the OCC rule) would argue that it creates regulatory uncertainty and a fragmented legal landscape for national banks. They believe that the OCC rule provides necessary uniformity and reduces compliance costs for federally chartered institutions, which ultimately benefits the broader financial system and potentially consumers through more efficient services.

Tradeoffs

The provision navigates the tension between federal regulatory uniformity for national banks and the preservation of state-level consumer protection laws. It also highlights the balance between bank operational efficiency and the financial benefits for homeowners from interest-bearing escrow accounts.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this