The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S.J.Res. 205·119th Congress·Introduced Aug 5, 2026

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Small Off-Road Engines Regulations; Notice of Decision".

IntroducedEnvironmental ProtectionSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Lummis, Cynthia M. [R-WY]
Committees
Environment and Public Works Committee (primary)
Last action
Aug 5, 2026

Bottom line

This resolution seeks to overturn an EPA rule that approved California's stricter emissions standards for small off-road engines, effectively blocking those state-specific environmental regulations.

What it actually does

This joint resolution utilizes the Congressional Review Act to disapprove and nullify a specific rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The EPA rule, published on January 6, 2025, concerned the approval of California's nonroad engine pollution control standards for small off-road engines. By passing this resolution, Congress would prevent California's stricter emission standards for equipment like lawnmowers and generators from taking effect.

Proponents argue

Supporters of this resolution argue that the EPA's rule grants California undue authority to set de facto national standards, leading to regulatory overreach and creating a burdensome patchwork of regulations for manufacturers. They contend that this action would protect industries reliant on small off-road engines, such as agriculture and landscaping, from increased costs and reduced equipment availability, promoting a more consistent national regulatory environment.

Opponents contend

Opponents of the resolution (i.e., proponents of the EPA rule) would argue that California has a legally established waiver authority under the Clean Air Act to set more stringent emissions standards to address its unique and severe air quality challenges. They would assert that the EPA's decision was consistent with federal law and is crucial for protecting public health and the environment from harmful pollutants emitted by small off-road engines, and that this resolution undermines states' rights to pursue environmental protection.

The bill text is exceptionally brief and clear, allowing for immediate comprehension of its direct action. The time required to read the bill is minimal, making it highly accessible for public review.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to ``California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Small Off-Road Engines Regulations; Notice of Decision'' (90 Fed. Reg. 640 (January 6, 2025)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.

Disapproval of EPA Rule on California Nonroad Engine Standards

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision explicitly states that Congress disapproves of a specific rule published by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on January 6, 2025. This rule pertains to the EPA's decision regarding California's pollution control standards for small off-road engines. By disapproving this rule, the resolution aims to prevent it from having any legal effect, thereby nullifying the EPA's approval of California's stricter regulations and preventing their implementation.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)ImpactLoss of regulatory authority regarding California's small off-road engine standards, specifically the nullification of its January 6, 2025 decision.MechanismCongressional disapproval under the Congressional Review Act.ScaleSpecific to one regulatory action, but with implications for federal-state environmental policy.
GroupState of CaliforniaImpactPrevention from implementing stricter small off-road engine emission standards that the EPA had previously approved.MechanismNullification of EPA's approval of California's waiver request, thereby blocking the state's regulatory action.ScaleAffects statewide environmental policy and air quality initiatives.
GroupManufacturers of small off-road engines (e.g., for lawnmowers, generators, construction equipment)ImpactContinued ability to sell current engine models in California without needing to redesign products to meet stricter state-specific emission standards, potentially avoiding compliance costs.MechanismAbsence of new, stricter state-specific emission requirements that would have been enabled by the EPA rule.ScalePotentially national market implications, as California's standards often influence broader industry trends.
GroupConsumers and businesses using small off-road engines (e.g., landscapers, homeowners, construction companies)ImpactContinued access to current engine technology and models, potentially avoiding higher initial costs or limited product availability that might result from new, stricter standards. However, also continued exposure to existing emission levels.MechanismAvoidance of potential price increases or changes in product offerings associated with new emission standards.ScaleWidespread, affecting many users of such equipment across various sectors.
GroupPublic health and environmental advocatesImpactContinued exposure to pollutants from small off-road engines, and the loss of potential air quality improvements and associated public health benefits that stricter standards would have provided.MechanismBlocking of stricter emission controls that were intended to reduce harmful emissions.ScaleRegional air quality impacts, particularly in areas with high usage of small off-road engines.

Supporters argue

Supporters of this provision argue that it restores regulatory consistency by preventing a single state's standards from effectively dictating national policy. They contend that the EPA's approval of California's rule creates an unnecessary burden on manufacturers and consumers, leading to higher costs and reduced product availability without a clear national benefit. They believe this disapproval protects economic interests and promotes a more streamlined regulatory environment.

Critics contend

Opponents of this provision argue that it undermines California's long-standing and legally recognized authority under the Clean Air Act to set more stringent emissions standards to address its unique and severe air quality challenges. They assert that blocking the EPA's approval prevents critical progress in reducing harmful air pollutants from a significant source, thereby compromising public health and environmental protection in California and potentially beyond.

Tradeoffs

This provision highlights a fundamental tension between the desire for national regulatory uniformity to ease burdens on industry and the principle of states' rights to set stricter environmental standards, particularly California's unique waiver authority. It balances the potential economic impacts on manufacturers and consumers against the public health and environmental benefits derived from reduced emissions.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this