2 versions

CosmeticWhat changed in ENGROSSED IN SENATEcompared with INTRODUCED IN SENATE (Oct 7, 2025)

Technical and procedural updates only. The later version (v2) reflects the bill's passage in the Senate, removing sponsor information and adding an attestation from the Secretary. No substantive policy changes were made to the resolution's text.

S.J.Res. 88119th CongressIntroduced Oct 7, 2025

A joint resolution terminating the national emergency declared to impose global tariffs.

Passed SenateForeign Trade and International FinanceMajor

View bill text

Sponsor: Sen. Wyden, Ron [D-OR]
Committees: Finance Committee (primary)
Last action: Oct 31, 2025

Bottom line

This joint resolution seeks to immediately end a national emergency that authorized global tariffs, thereby revoking the President's authority to impose those specific tariffs.

What it actually does

This joint resolution, if enacted, would immediately terminate the national emergency declared by the President on April 2, 2025, through Executive Order 14257. This action is taken pursuant to the National Emergencies Act, which grants Congress the power to end such declarations. The termination would effectively revoke the President's authority to impose global tariffs under that specific emergency declaration, leading to their cessation.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that the national emergency and the resulting global tariffs are either no longer necessary or were ill-conceived, causing harm to domestic industries, consumers, and international trade relations. They contend that Congress has a constitutional duty, through the National Emergencies Act, to check executive power and ensure that emergency declarations are not prolonged beyond their necessity or used inappropriately, advocating for a return to more open trade policies.

Opponents contend

Opponents of the resolution, who support the tariffs, would likely argue that the national emergency and the tariffs it enabled are crucial for national security, protecting domestic industries from unfair foreign competition, or addressing specific economic threats. They might assert that terminating the emergency would undermine the President's ability to respond effectively to ongoing or future challenges and could weaken the nation's economic leverage in global markets.

The bill is exceptionally short and clear, making it very accessible for any reader to understand its core purpose quickly.

Section 1

Termination of National Emergency Declared by Executive Order 14257

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision explicitly states that the national emergency declared by the President on April 2, 2025, through Executive Order 14257, is terminated. This termination is effective immediately upon the enactment of this joint resolution. Consequently, any global tariffs that were imposed under the authority of that specific emergency declaration would be lifted, ceasing their collection and application.

GroupImpactMechanismScale

GroupBusinesses and consumers engaged in international tradeImpactEconomic relief/change in cost structureMechanismRemoval of tariffs previously imposed under the national emergencyScaleGlobal, affecting all goods previously subject to tariffs under EO 14257

GroupFederal government (Executive Branch)ImpactReduction in executive authorityMechanismCongressional termination of a presidential emergency declarationScaleSpecific to the national emergency declared by EO 14257

Supporters argue

Supporters of this provision argue that the tariffs imposed under Executive Order 14257 have had detrimental effects on the economy, increasing costs for consumers and businesses, and potentially inviting retaliatory measures from other countries. They believe that ending the emergency is a necessary step to restore free trade principles and alleviate economic burdens.

Critics contend

Opponents of terminating the emergency would argue that the tariffs are a vital tool for protecting domestic industries, ensuring national security, or correcting trade imbalances. They might contend that removing these tariffs prematurely could expose domestic markets to unfair competition, jeopardize jobs, or weaken the nation's strategic economic position.

Tradeoffs

The provision navigates the tension between executive authority to declare national emergencies and congressional oversight, as well as the economic debate between protectionist tariffs and free trade. It trades potential domestic industry protection (via tariffs) for lower costs for importers and consumers, and potentially improved international trade relations.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.