MajorHighly contested
View record

House Adopts Resolution Condemning Government Fraud 235-177, While Rejecting FISA Title VII Extension 198-218

HouseJun 11, 2026

The House of Representatives convened for a session marked by significant legislative action and debate. The chamber voted on two key measures: a resolution condemning fraud against the United States Government and expressing support for prevention reforms, which was adopted, and a motion to suspend the rules and pass a bill to extend authorities of Title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, which failed. The debate surrounding the fraud resolution highlighted deep partisan divisions regarding the scope and attribution of fraud within federal programs.

This chamber-day was significant due to the disposition of two consequential matters. The adoption of H. Res. 1335 formally condemned government fraud and signaled the House's intent to pursue prevention reforms, albeit through a highly partisan vote. The failure to extend FISA Title VII, a critical national security authority, represents a notable legislative setback with potential implications for intelligence gathering capabilities. The day also featured extensive floor debate on the nature of government fraud and political accountability.

1.

Condemning Actors Seeking to Defraud the United States Government

H. Res. 1335

Question before the chamber

The pending question was on the adoption of H. Res. 1335, a resolution condemning fraudulent actions against the United States Government and advocating for fraud prevention reforms.

The case for

Proponents argued that fraud in federal programs is an unsustainable national fiscal emergency, costing American taxpayers billions annually. They cited Government Accountability Office estimates of $233 billion to $521 billion lost to fraud each year. Specific examples of alleged widespread fraud were highlighted in Minnesota's social services programs (potentially $9 billion stolen), California's hospice system ($3 billion identified), and Ohio's Medicaid waiver program. They asserted that State officials, including Minnesota's Governor and Attorney General, were aware of fraud but failed to act, and that the Trump administration's Task Force to Eliminate Fraud has already uncovered billions in suspected fraud. The resolution emphasizes the need for pre-payment eligibility verification to prevent fraud.

The case against

Opponents argued that the resolution was a partisan attack, selectively focusing on Democratic-led states while ignoring significant fraud in Republican-led states like Mississippi (TANF fraud, $77 million stolen, $101 million repayment ordered), Oklahoma, and Alabama (leading in SNAP fraud). They criticized the Trump administration for pardoning numerous convicted fraudsters (including those involved in over $1.6 billion in Medicare/Medicaid fraud), firing inspectors general, and defunding fraud investigation programs, which they claimed undermined efforts to combat fraud. They also raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest and alleged financial benefits for the Trump family from government actions.

Disposition

Adopted · recorded vote

The resolution was adopted by a recorded vote of 235 yeas to 177 nays, with 2 Members answering 'present'.

235-177

Fiscal ResponsibilityGovernment IntegrityProtection of Vulnerable PopulationsPolitical Accountability

Who is affected

  • American taxpayers: Billions of dollars in taxpayer money are lost to fraud annually, impacting their financial prosperity and trust in government.
  • Vulnerable recipients of federal programs (children, low-income seniors, veterans, disabled individuals): Fraud diverts funds intended for their essential services and benefits, delaying or preventing them from receiving aid.
  • State and local government agencies: Highlighted for lacking sufficient internal controls and oversight to detect and prevent fraud in federally funded programs.
2.

Extension of Authorities of Title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978

H.R. 9238

Question before the chamber

The pending question was on the motion to suspend the rules and pass H.R. 9238, a bill to extend the authorities of Title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978.

The case for

No debate was aired in the Record regarding the proponents' case for H.R. 9238 during this proceeding.

The case against

No debate was aired in the Record regarding the opponents' case against H.R. 9238 during this proceeding.

Disposition

Rejected · recorded vote

The motion to suspend the rules and pass H.R. 9238 failed to achieve the necessary two-thirds affirmative vote, with 198 yeas and 218 nays.

198-218

National SecurityCivil LibertiesGovernment Oversight

Who is affected

  • U.S. intelligence agencies: The failure to extend FISA Title VII authorities may impact their ability to conduct foreign intelligence surveillance.
  • Individuals subject to surveillance: The status of surveillance authorities affects privacy and civil liberties, though specific impacts were not debated.

House Adopts Resolution Condemning Government Fraud

high

The House adopted H. Res. 1335, condemning fraudulent actions against the U.S. Government and advocating for prevention reforms, by a recorded vote of 235 yeas to 177 nays. The resolution specifically cited estimated annual fraud losses of hundreds of billions of dollars and highlighted ongoing investigations into fraud in Minnesota, California, and Ohio, while also acknowledging actions taken by the Trump administration to combat fraud.

Motion to Extend FISA Title VII Fails

high

A motion to suspend the rules and pass H.R. 9238, a bill to extend the authorities of Title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, failed to achieve the necessary two-thirds majority, with a recorded vote of 198 yeas to 218 nays. No debate on the merits of the bill or the extension was recorded prior to the vote.

Partisan Divide on Government Fraud Accountability

medium

During the debate on H. Res. 1335, a clear partisan divide emerged. Proponents emphasized the scale of fraud and specific instances in states with Democratic leadership, while opponents argued the resolution was a partisan attack, selectively ignoring fraud in Republican-led states and actions by the Trump administration, such as pardoning convicted fraudsters and defunding oversight bodies.

Discharge Petition Filed on House Resolution 830

medium

A discharge petition (Petition 23) was filed by Mrs. Fletcher on House Resolution 830, signed by a list of Members. This procedural mechanism allows a majority of the House to bring a measure to the floor for a vote, bypassing committee consideration.

AI Disclaimer. Summaries are generated using AI to summarize Congressional Records. AI can make mistakes. Please verify important information with official sources.
Journalism Disclaimer. This site provides summaries of official congressional documents. We are not a news organization. Our summaries reflect what was said in Congress, not independent fact-checking or investigative reporting.
Ask Ledger AI about this